fossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前Resourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square249fedilinkarrow-up1879
arrow-up1879imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square249fedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 年前But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
minus-squarerainwall@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 年前Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
numbers must go up