• wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you get to a public park in a privately operated taxi doesn’t mean the park is suddenly private. It would also be absurd for the taxi to have a say in how you spend your time in the park.

        I also refuse to trust that any private corporation would have my best interests at heart, or that they would not use the excuse of policing hate speech to also interfere with discussion against their corporate interests.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you enter the taxi and the driver sees that you’ve got a shirt with a swastika the driver can tell you they’re not taking you for this reason.

                  • regalia@literature.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Bro you are dense. I can say water is wet when I’m asked a completely different question, doesn’t change the fact that doesn’t have anything to do with the question asked. I didn’t bring up if free speech is applied to private spaces, that’s an entirely different comment that nobody said, we already know the answer, hence why it wasn’t asked. I asked why you specifically, don’t think that should apply, which is why I asked that. You didn’t read correctly, and was asked three times now and are still avoiding the question for some reason, you either do or don’t support it and you are avoiding stating either which is the whole fucking point of this thread, and now it’s a waste of time because you don’t want to share your opinion for the sake of downvotes?