• ah yes, non-traditional housing as vehicles and cardboard structures.

    something insidious as hell about the US in the post war era is how broke people can’t even cobble together something to live in like they did during the depression. and they may claim the bans are due to safety, but far fewer fucks are given about shady, substandard/dangerous housing with mold etc when theres a landlord.coplecting a check.

    the ban is 100% about how slums make the ruling class and their administrators look bad.

  • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    [x] may seem like a way to save money, but it can come with unexpected costs and trap families in a cycle of debt.

    amerikkka.jpg

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    would be nice if this wasnt also commercialized as a “lifestyle” and sold at a premium. now instead of poor people living in rvs and tiny houses, rich people buy them and live in them temporarily while never shutting up about how scrappy they are for it

    “we converted a bus into a house:)” no your wealth paid a worker to convert a bus into a house

  • Beaver [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s an interesting phenomenon. In other countries, weakly defined property rights and the lack of wealth means that people built slums in the marginal areas around cities. In the US, people are much wealthier in an absolute sense, and pretty much all land is enclosed and defended by psychotically strong property rights. Because of that, marginal housing is taking the form of living in vehicles to keep mobile… or rough sleeping / tents for those who are extremely poor in an absolute sense, and can’t afford a vehicle.

  • Test_Tickles [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    the tiny home trend was kind of an extension of this to me. while yes there are valid reasons to downsize from McMansions to maybe just what we need but no one ever mentioned it’s because they’ve been priced out of the housing market.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      eh, if you watch tiny house tours on youtube, a bunch of them mention that this way they’re mortgage free and get to have savings. some mentioned that the only way they can afford to do this is cos they have a friend or some family member who owns land and allowed them to put the tiny house on it for free/very cheap.

      the real kicker is tiny house communities. which are trailer parks for downwardly mobile “middle class” people.

  • vegeta1 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Its sad that many of these will end up posting memes about ‘communist housing units being monotonous or depressng’ when this is basically a shanty town. And hell the cost adds up to more than a shanty

    • AF_R [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t help that Americans are generally terrible neighbors, and sharing a wall with them is even worse. This causes people to seek larger and larger spaces for themselves exclusively, and makes almost all apartment style living infeasible.

      Gee who could have predicted that an individualist society would eventually result in everyone being a shitty person

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        also that american houses tend to have thinner walls with less sound insulation (than europe, i dunno about the rest of the world), which compounds the problem. not that we dont hear our neighbors here in europe. we just make do.