stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Food@slrpnk.net · edit-224 days agoAre vertical farms really the answer? A new study reveals their surprisingly large footprint | Most striking was the doubly high land-use of vertical farms compared to conventional oneswww.anthropocenemagazine.orgexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up112
arrow-up112external-linkAre vertical farms really the answer? A new study reveals their surprisingly large footprint | Most striking was the doubly high land-use of vertical farms compared to conventional oneswww.anthropocenemagazine.orgstabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Food@slrpnk.net · edit-224 days agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareLvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-224 days agoI don’t think they’re the answer now, but they might become one among many answers in the future, as they improve. I feel like a lot of the issues pointed out are a result of inefficiency. You’d need better designed systems, but for example: heating - solar panels pretty much waste Sun heating. This should be redirected towards plants. cooling - instead of cooling the farm, design it so you can reflect heat in hot days lighting - instead of converting blue/red lights into electricity and back into light, couldn’t the light be redirected towards the plants? And there’s an obvious benefit of vertical farms the text doesn’t mention: you can produce electricity in otherwise wasted land.
I don’t think they’re the answer now, but they might become one among many answers in the future, as they improve.
I feel like a lot of the issues pointed out are a result of inefficiency. You’d need better designed systems, but for example:
And there’s an obvious benefit of vertical farms the text doesn’t mention: you can produce electricity in otherwise wasted land.