• shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Is the purpose of human intimacy procreation?

    If no, then why can’t we have intimacy without the unnecessary outcome of the propagation of our species?

    If yes, should we require that every relationship between man and woman result in offspring? But we don’t, do we?

    So, if we have the personal freedom to choose whether our relationships result in progeny and if there is more to intimacy than procreation, why are you so afraid of non-heterosexual relationships?

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Two people that have a fully transmissable genetic conditon (which has caused them immense suffering) choose to share sexual intimacy without procreating (so as to not propogate that suffering). Should they be deprived of that intimacy (which acts as a reprieve from their suffering) simply because they choose not to create a new person who will also inevitably have to suffer?

        • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Those people are unfit for life, so whatever. Just kill them at birth or if it’s too late for that, ASAP.

          – those ppl, probably

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      If a random ass crow can have a gay life partner and other crows see no problem with it. Then what’s humanities excuse?

      ARE THE CROWS JUST BETTER THEN US? I mean probably but THEY SHOULDN’T BE. We should be AT LEAST on par with crows!