Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world ·
edit-2
3 年前

63% of workers unable to pay a $500 emergency expense, survey finds. How employers may help change that

www.cnbc.com

external-link
message-square
154
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • workreform@lemmy.world
535
external-link

63% of workers unable to pay a $500 emergency expense, survey finds. How employers may help change that

www.cnbc.com

return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world ·
edit-2
3 年前
message-square
154
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • workreform@lemmy.world
High inflation continues to add financial stress to workers' budgets. Experts say new benefits to provide emergency savings plans may help.
  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    https://oldurbanist.blogspot.com/2013/02/was-rise-of-car-ownership-responsible.html

    home ownership and car ownership is up since the 1950s

    how come more people have those things that are hard to afford than before?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 年前

      In part because black people can own those things more easily now.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 年前

        Sure, but people pining for the lifestyle of the 50s forget they are looking at the top 10% of incomes. Life in the 50s wasn’t that good compared to now for the AVERAGE person

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 年前

          Except they had things like the G.I. bill which gave them money to go to college or buy a house and improve their lives. Every man who was in the military in WWII had that as an option. Maybe some didn’t utilize it, but that was by choice. If you include their spouses and children, that’s way more than 10% of the population.

          Wages were comparatively higher too.

          But I don’t know anyone on the left pining for the lifestyle of the 1950s, that’s something conservatives want. I wouldn’t mind the wages of the 1950s (adjusted for inflation) and I wouldn’t mind taxing the rich at 90%, but I sure would mind the racism and the sexism.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 年前

            I wouldn’t mind the wages of the 1950s (adjusted for inflation)

            Adjusted for inflation, much lower than today

            I wouldn’t mind taxing the rich at 90%

            There were loopholes that allowed most people to pay much less, so that’s why they closed those loopholes later

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 年前

              Adjusted for inflation, much lower than today

              Evidence please.

              There were loopholes that allowed most people to pay much less, so that’s why they closed those loopholes later

              Remind me how much rich people pay in taxes now.

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 年前

                We don’t have good WAGE data before 1964

                https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:United_States_real_wages_(red,_in_constant_2017_dollars).png

                but we also have household income data for earlier years

                https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/famincome.html

                but it doesn’t match 100% because what a household is differs (households used to be bigger in the 1950s)

                but you can see that 1950-1964 the household incomes grew quickly, so the 1950s were a period of growth, you were a lot better off by 1970

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 年前

                  You made a claim about 1950s income you now can’t back up? Interesting.

                  • iopq@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 年前

                    https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/famincome.html

                    Look at it, family income was lower

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 124 users / 6 months
  • 152 local subscribers
  • 34.9K subscribers
  • 28.5K Posts
  • 654K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org