I’ve been trying Lemmy for a little while and wasn’t sure how to feel about it.

Today, I wanted to start blocking the most high-censorship instances until I could find a fully zero-censorship instance and simply block all the ones with censorship. Filter bots, not people.

When I looked into it further, I found out there are no zero-censorship instances, because Lemmy relies on a broken “federation” system where each instance is supposed to be able to fetch posts from other instances, but it’s never been finished to reach a fully working state. Lemmy’s official docs say you can’t even do federation over Tor at all. This means it uses DNS, so it won’t actually allow Lemmy instances to fetch posts from each other freely, it just gets blocked instantly and easily, every time the authorities feel like blocking anything.

So you can only ever have the “average joe lemmy” and “average joe reddit” with everything approved by the authorities, and then “tor copies of lemmy” and “tor copies of reddit” where you have free speech but you can only reach other nerds.

People seem to think Lemmy is different because this weird censorship fetish is extremely popular and most of you are happy to see bans happen to certain people, not just bots, so a small Lemmy that censors certain people feels fundamentally different from a big reddit that censors more people. But it’s the exact same thing, it’s reddit.

When reddit was smaller, you could say basically anything you wanted there, they just wouldn’t let it reach the main audience. Then it got too big, and any tiny part of the audience you could reach would be too big, so they won’t let you talk at all.

Lemmy is now the small part of reddit where you can say whatever you want, separated from the main audience, until too much growth happens and you have to move again.

It’s not actually a solution to reddit. It’s not designed to be different, it’s designed to match the past today and then match reddit’s present tomorrow, while being part of a system that’s about the same in past, present, and future.

Last year, this year, and next year, you’re posting somewhere it won’t be seen by many people, and the system that charges people for ambulance rides is getting another year of ambulance ride revenue, facing no organized resistance. There’s no difference here.

Lemmy urgently needs federation between onion service instances and DNS addresses in order to actually do what most users seem to wish it would do: allow discussion outside what the corporate authorities allow, while outgrowing reddit & helping undo the damage social media has done to human communication.

  • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They still own the actual instance that exists on their local servers.

    How?

    If they are meddled with, they’re meddled with but this is a hypothetical currently.

    How? Do I need to yet again repeat how this isn’t true, because you missed it, or are you just leaving out another half of the paragraph where you support your statements and connect your counter-argument to the context?

    They certainly “own” their server more than I do or you do.

    I don’t know who you are. I probably own most servers more than most people based on how much influence I’ve been allowed to exert so far without being killed. Not sure. Wouldn’t even be a topic to discuss though, if Lemmy used Tor, where instead of complex collective human webs of “ownership,” you just straight up have a guy with a thing that’s his that no one else has so he “owns” it

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      How?

      It’s backed up at home, presumably.

      How? Do I need to yet again repeat how this isn’t true, because you missed it, or are you just leaving out another half of the paragraph where you support your statements and connect your counter-argument to the context?

      You have provided no example of any regulatory body or government meddling with interfering with the operation of any Lemmy instance.

      • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s backed up at home, presumably.

        That’s maybe absolute individual ownership of a backup, nothing like absolute individual ownership of a Lemmy instance.

        You have provided no example of any regulatory body or government meddling with interfering with the operation of any Lemmy instance.

        You have provided no reason I should provide an example, despite repeatedly suggesting I should, and repeatedly being asked why.

        I’ll ask another thing this time: what do you find when you just look it up? Does that not work?

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You have provided no reason I should provide an example, despite repeatedly suggesting I should, and repeatedly being asked why.

          Because you made the claims. You back it up. Not moving on this.

          I’ll ask another thing this time: what do you find when you just look it up? Does that not work?

          There is no example. It doesn’t exist. It hasn’t happened.

          • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You have provided no reason I should provide an example, despite repeatedly suggesting I should, and repeatedly being asked why.

            Because you made the claims. You back it up. Not moving on this.

            I don’t see any valid reasoning here. Wondering if you’ll try again or not - hopefully you’re done wasting time repeating this nonsense.

            I’ll ask another thing this time: what do you find when you just look it up? Does that not work?

            There is no example. It doesn’t exist. It hasn’t happened.

            Screenshot where you get that search result?

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t see any valid reasoning here. Wondering if you’ll try again or not - hopefully you’re done wasting time repeating this nonsense.

              I’m never done. You made the claims, you back it up.

              Screenshot where you get that search result?

              How can I prove a negative? There’s no example that you can provide of a lemmy instance being forcibly censored by outside actors.

              • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I’m never done.

                Are you implying I’ll run out of motivation to embarrass you, before you run out of motivation to embarrass yourself?

                Seems unlikely.

                You made the claims, you back it up.

                Why? You’ve repeatedly suggested I should do this, but repeatedly ignored me asking why.

                What do you see when you Google it? That’s another question you keep ignoring.

                How can I prove a negative?

                Why do you ask such a dumb question right after quoting the part where I asked for proof of your search result, which you didn’t include?

                There’s no example that you can provide of a lemmy instance being forcibly censored by outside actors.

                Didn’t ask. Why waste time with this part?

                • Skavau@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Why do you ask such a dumb question right after quoting the part where I asked for proof of your search result, which you didn’t include?

                  How can a search result disprove a negative? Do you actually know what I mean by that?

                  Didn’t ask. Why waste time with this part?

                  I did. Where’s your evidence for this claim? And you have suggested it repeatedly in other comments.

                  • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    How can a search result disprove a negative?

                    Not my problem. Why the fuck are you asking me while you keep ignoring me asking you to prove a search result? Why would I have advice for you on some random unrelated shit right now?

                    Do you actually know what I mean by that?

                    I’m just reading it as plain English. If you mean something other than what you said, it’s not my problem, is there some reason I should give a fuck?

                    I did.

                    The question was: “why waste time with this part?”

                    Where’s your evidence for this claim?

                    I remember not asking.

                    And you have suggested it repeatedly in other comments.

                    Because you have repeatedly injected irrelevant shit I didn’t ask about in yours.