I’ve been trying Lemmy for a little while and wasn’t sure how to feel about it.

Today, I wanted to start blocking the most high-censorship instances until I could find a fully zero-censorship instance and simply block all the ones with censorship. Filter bots, not people.

When I looked into it further, I found out there are no zero-censorship instances, because Lemmy relies on a broken “federation” system where each instance is supposed to be able to fetch posts from other instances, but it’s never been finished to reach a fully working state. Lemmy’s official docs say you can’t even do federation over Tor at all. This means it uses DNS, so it won’t actually allow Lemmy instances to fetch posts from each other freely, it just gets blocked instantly and easily, every time the authorities feel like blocking anything.

So you can only ever have the “average joe lemmy” and “average joe reddit” with everything approved by the authorities, and then “tor copies of lemmy” and “tor copies of reddit” where you have free speech but you can only reach other nerds.

People seem to think Lemmy is different because this weird censorship fetish is extremely popular and most of you are happy to see bans happen to certain people, not just bots, so a small Lemmy that censors certain people feels fundamentally different from a big reddit that censors more people. But it’s the exact same thing, it’s reddit.

When reddit was smaller, you could say basically anything you wanted there, they just wouldn’t let it reach the main audience. Then it got too big, and any tiny part of the audience you could reach would be too big, so they won’t let you talk at all.

Lemmy is now the small part of reddit where you can say whatever you want, separated from the main audience, until too much growth happens and you have to move again.

It’s not actually a solution to reddit. It’s not designed to be different, it’s designed to match the past today and then match reddit’s present tomorrow, while being part of a system that’s about the same in past, present, and future.

Last year, this year, and next year, you’re posting somewhere it won’t be seen by many people, and the system that charges people for ambulance rides is getting another year of ambulance ride revenue, facing no organized resistance. There’s no difference here.

Lemmy urgently needs federation between onion service instances and DNS addresses in order to actually do what most users seem to wish it would do: allow discussion outside what the corporate authorities allow, while outgrowing reddit & helping undo the damage social media has done to human communication.

  • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lemmy.world. You seemed to suggest they were somehow pressured into implementing rules against CSAM material.

    OK, and?

    Your memory is shocking.

    Didn’t ask. Also, read Small Gods (or honestly any book please)

    You did not answer.

    Not again, no, because I remembered it being answered where you asked it.

    Burden of proof. Onus is on you.

    I asked if there was a way that’s true in this case. Is there?

    I’m not going to stop.

    I think you’ll stop replying before me, even if you have to ban me and pretend that’s me stopping replying.

    Non-negotiable.

    What do you mean? You have some way of forcing me to do what you want?

    You have never backed up a single claim with a single source.

    Incorrect.

    You make claims, you back them up.

    Correct, generally.

    That’s how it works.

    Clearly not for everyone. You’re obviously not working this way right now. But I do, yes.

    I meant are you of the position that the USA exercises its long arm to shut down websites all across the world.

    I think you should rephrase that to “are you dumb enough to think the USA doesn’t exercise its long arm to shut down websites all across the world?”

    AI results.

    OK, still sounds true, but kinda embarrassing to be quoting here out of nowhere.

    I didn’t. You did.

    Incorrect. Scroll up.

    You bought Hamas.ps. being taken offline.

    Didn’t ask. I asked why you brought up the topic we were discussing, in which Hamas.ps had been one of the subtopics.

    That your efforts here are completely useless.

    Incorrect then.

    Both of these things can’t be true.

    Incorrect. I’ve only been saying true things, so without reading the part you were responding to here, I can assume it was two things I said which were both true.

    If there’s enough interest, then go and make your own fork and edit of Lemmy to work in TOR.

    Why would I do that?

    Which is to say, no - you don’t.

    This is you admitting you’ve asked and been answered multiple times, and still continued dishonestly repeating yourself.

    Are you starting to break out of the dishonesty, or just getting sloppy?

    And you’re making things up.

    Incorrect.

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      OK, and?

      Any evidence for your claim that lemmy.world mods were pressured into this?

      I asked if there was a way that’s true in this case. Is there?

      If what is true?

      What do you mean? You have some way of forcing me to do what you want?

      No, just I’m not going to change my position.

      I think you should rephrase that to “are you dumb enough to think the USA doesn’t exercise its long arm to shut down websites all across the world?”

      Can you show me some examples of the USA doing this?

      Didn’t ask. I asked why you brought up the topic we were discussing, in which Hamas.ps had been one of the subtopics.

      Hamas.ps was first mentioned by you, not me.

      Why would I do that?

      How else is it going to get done? How else do you plan to get Lemmy on TOR?

      I doubt very much you even know what you’re asking me in most of these posts, to be frank. Your memory of my prior replies is terrible.

      • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Any evidence for your claim that lemmy.world mods were pressured into this?

        Yeah, but why did you put this right after a quote of yet another place where you ignored what I said in yet another one of my replies?

        If what is true?

        I don’t know, I’m not scrolling up to check.

        No, just I’m not going to change my position.

        That doesn’t make “non-negotiable” an applicable term to inject when begging someone to do something for you, lmao

        Can you show me some examples of the USA doing this?

        Too tired of your shit to read the part where you quoted what you’re asking for examples of, let alone hold your hand through Google searches.

        Hamas.ps was first mentioned by you, not me.

        Didn’t ask. I asked why you brought up the topic we were discussing, in which Hamas.ps had been one of the subtopics.

        Why did you just make me repeat that? Just to abusively waste my time and energy, right?

        How else is it going to get done?

        I don’t know, is it? Why are you asking like I would know?

        How else do you plan to get Lemmy on TOR?

        I don’t, why are you asking like I do? Just to abusively waste my time and energy, right?

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but why did you put this right after a quote of yet another place where you ignored what I said in yet another one of my replies?

          I don’t care. Where’s your evidence?

          I don’t know, I’m not scrolling up to check.

          My point exactly. You barely know what you’re replying to.

          Too tired of your shit to read the part where you quoted what you’re asking for examples of, let alone hold your hand through Google searches.

          So, no, you can’t. You make claims and everyone has to disprove them.

          Didn’t ask. I asked why you brought up the topic we were discussing, in which Hamas.ps had been one of the subtopics.

          No, you referenced them suddenly as a site that was shut down.

          I don’t, why are you asking like I do? Just to abusively waste my time and energy, right?

          “Abusive”? Am I keeping you here?

          If you don’t plan to get lemmy on TOR, then what’s the point of any of this?

          • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t care. Where’s your evidence?

            If you don’t care about my question, why are you asking one?

            My point exactly.

            Nope. You don’t have one.

            You barely know what you’re replying to.

            Incorrect.

            So, no, you can’t. You make claims and everyone has to disprove them.

            Not sure what you’re saying, but doesn’t sound like it makes sense.

            No, you referenced them suddenly as a site that was shut down.

            Incorrect. You brought up the topic they were a subtopic in. Why do you keep repeating the same lies? Is there a reason other than that you’re deeply mentally ill?

            “Abusive”? Am I keeping you here?

            Why do you keep acting like you need everything repeated so many times? Is there a reason other than that you’re a pathologically abusive person?

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m not holding you captive, making you respond. That it upsets you so much is an entirely self-inflicted problem.

              Incorrect. You brought up the topic they were a subtopic in. Why do you keep repeating the same lies? Is there a reason other than that you’re deeply mentally ill?

              Here’s you first mentioning them.

              • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m not holding you captive, making you respond.

                I didn’t ask if you were. Why waste time typing that?

                That it upsets you so much is an entirely self-inflicted problem.

                I don’t understand. How much do you mean? What problem? Whose self?

                Here’s you first mentioning them.

                First mentioning what, and why are you giving me a link to my own post?

                • Skavau@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I didn’t ask if you were. Why waste time typing that?

                  I didn’t ask if you asked. Why waste time typing that?

                  I don’t understand. How much do you mean? What problem? Whose self?

                  You keep crying about me abusing you.

                  First mentioning what, and why are you giving me a link to my own post?

                  You can’t be serious. You really can’t be serious. You can’t trace back 1 post to see what I was referring to there in the source?

                  • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I didn’t ask if you asked. Why waste time typing that?

                    It wasn’t a waste of time, my words matter.

                    You keep crying about me abusing you.

                    Incorrect. Perhaps you have “crying” confused with “replying.”

                    You can’t be serious.

                    I think I’m kinda good at being serious, actually.

                    You really can’t be serious.

                    Repeating it doesn’t make me agree.

                    You can’t trace back 1 post to see what I was referring to there in the source?

                    What do you mean?