Yes. Of the two, they are the least likely sex to sexual assault. That’s not the flex you think it is.
Does that mean they’re never problematic? Not a problem worth preventing with a simple search filter? A search filter they already have the inverse of? One they could implement before the weekend?
I personally know 2 guys who’ve been sexually harassed and assaulted by women. One who was actually raped by a woman. It happens less often, sure. But saying that it’s not worth doing the bare minimum to prevent it, is dumb.
At a ratio of about a magnitude difference, I think it is. For every one woman committing assault, several men are doing the same.
Not a problem worth preventing with a simple search filter?
The main issue is the weaponization of that filter. The original purpose is addressing a problem as a band-aid, and the inverse is handing out a loaded gun. It’s not foolproof, but by the looks of these thousands of lawsuits, it’s better than nothing.
I personally know 2 guys who’ve been sexually harassed and assaulted by women.
What makes you think I haven’t been assaulted by women a couple of times? I’ve been sexually assaulted by men a whole lot more since I was 16. What’s your point? I know about 10 women who have suffered sexual and physical violence, and I know about four men who have suffered the same. We can’t deny this is a lopsided issue that affects a whole lot of people that we all know.
Yes. Of the two, they are the least likely sex to sexual assault. That’s not the flex you think it is.
Does that mean they’re never problematic? Not a problem worth preventing with a simple search filter? A search filter they already have the inverse of? One they could implement before the weekend?
I personally know 2 guys who’ve been sexually harassed and assaulted by women. One who was actually raped by a woman. It happens less often, sure. But saying that it’s not worth doing the bare minimum to prevent it, is dumb.
At a ratio of about a magnitude difference, I think it is. For every one woman committing assault, several men are doing the same.
The main issue is the weaponization of that filter. The original purpose is addressing a problem as a band-aid, and the inverse is handing out a loaded gun. It’s not foolproof, but by the looks of these thousands of lawsuits, it’s better than nothing.
What makes you think I haven’t been assaulted by women a couple of times? I’ve been sexually assaulted by men a whole lot more since I was 16. What’s your point? I know about 10 women who have suffered sexual and physical violence, and I know about four men who have suffered the same. We can’t deny this is a lopsided issue that affects a whole lot of people that we all know.
Your argument is literally “Since one problem is worse, it justifies actively avoiding doing anything about the other.”
I think you got it backwards.
Then it seems you failed to explain yourself clearly.
Or you failed to read properly.
That’s not how this works.
We don’t blame the student if they don’t understand the material.
Reading comprehension is a skill.
So is writing.
Hell there are university degrees in communication.