This is just a partial list of this POS’s ban and block evasion tactics. Every two to three days, this asshole forces an instance to federate out, wasting their resources, and doesn’t give a shit who has banned or tried to block them. Then a large number from every one of these account is very heavily upvoted. Oh, that isn’t suspicious at all, especially when over 90% of what this fuckwqd posts is the laziest kind of repost (just blatantly ripped from .ml in a likely automated way similar to the the account creation likely is since they will make accounts on instances less than a day old).

I am fucking tired of this shitty, bad faith action and this is proof that it is high time that an instance needs the ability to straight up perma ban a username from any instance. I am aware that PieFed has this feature and right now it seems like something so incredibly basic. One person has the power to make all of Lemmy effectively useless, and it needs to stop being that way immediately.

  • guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Tbh I kinda like it, I have .ml blocked, so if someone is going in there and filtering out the good content to post elsewhere, I’m not opposed.

    E: it is annoying that there’s like 100 accounts of them, but meh, it’s not a huge deal to me

  • Gamma@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Honestly I haven’t ever had a complaint against them, I don’t really pay attention to names and appreciate their effort to grow coms outside of ml.

    I do notice the constant complaining though, that’s annoying!

    • hatorade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Books and making art are too boring. Making new accounts every month and manually reposting content to the point dozens of users ask if you’re a bot a week is a better time.

    • cm0002@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Documentation of their toxic extremism it’s a little more than mere “dislike” when they themselves are toxic to the Threadiverse and support the idea that anyone not aligned with their authoritarian values should just “go back to Reddit”

      Hamid hmm any relation to the hardcore tankie defender hamid@vegantheoryclub 🤔

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    cm0002 is a cryptofash who likes to hang out with other like minded individuals and complain about communists like it’s his full time job

    using lemmy.ml means I almost never have to interact with him, I don’t even have to bother to block him

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I think the broader solution is approval-based instance federation. I know that’s a little anti-fed, but this type of attack has no other solution I can think of, and banning a username just means the attacker rotates those, (too).

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      There’s steps in between. Rate limiting unverified server federations, etc. No need to inhibit discovery for casual users

  • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t like the content they post (it’s indistinguishable from botspam) and I especially don’t like the fact that I can’t just block it. Every week it’s a new spam account.

    Blocking is a user ban. Making so many new accounts is (from a personal, user-experience level only) very much like ban evasion in that view. The experience fucking blows.

    I get that a lot of people are digging what cm0002 posts, and I don’t mind that they are getting off to it. I don’t, and I’m tired of playing block wak a mole. I don’t know what else to do but to keep blocking every time they get bored and make (for some reason???) yet another (over twenty and growing!) account on a new instance. I could see two or even three for like, you want to keep a porn account separate from public, or you want a mander persona and a world persona or something, but this is so supermuch not that.

    If people don’t like me, and no doubt I’m on a lot of people’s blocklists (for good reason…), they can block my single name and move on with their lives and never have to deal with my manic bullshit ever again. More power to them, go off and slay, queen, it’s a great feature of this broad community.

    Is it really too much to ask to be shown the same courtesy?

        • hatorade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If one person smells like dogshit, that person probably smells like dog shit. If everyone you meet smells like dog shit, check your shoes.

          “If dozens of users have issues with me, I can’t be wrong. They are!”

          Major .world players are just from Reddit so we can’t expect much.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    The way I see it, it can be made part of other features. Have names be auto-reserved locally between instances for future user migrations if they desire. Having the same username for different instances for different people is deceptive as fuck and will be abused as well if it hasn’t been yet.

    That a user acting in bad faith retains the same name throughout different instances is merely coincidental - I doubt they won’t mind switching it up, specially if they are automating account creation and astrosurfing.

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Man it’s crazy how many people have no ability to self-reflect here

      You can’t see why blocking a person could be useful? Yikes.

      This is an excellent way to find people who don’t contribute though! A honeypot for jerks.

      And it would be so fucking annoying if you just created more accounts so I had to run into your ass again

      Keep the downvotes coming! I see you, I wish you’d comment so it’s easier to block the useless people. Cowards gonna be cowards though

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        This is an excellent way to find people who don’t contribute though! A honeypot for jerks.

        And it would be _so fucking annoying_ if you just created more accounts so I had to run into your ass again

        Does this mean I’m blocked? Looks like some gifts just wrap themselves!

        And for the record, LMAO….

        If I were going to ban evade, I don’t think I’d use the same name. Only people stupid enough to think this is a ban evading tactic would be dumb enough to do that. So trust me when I say, if you end up seeing me again, it’ll be under a different tame if I were the type to care enough about you to bother.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Which is why it’s so easy to ban people for being bad at attempting to evade/circumvent a ban. Obviously it’s harder to catch someone who’s smarter about it. You just try your best though.

          The bare minimum is doing something about the lazy evasion attempts. though.

  • cm0002@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For other people blocking me, I don’t really care if they do or don’t, it’s just unfortunate unintended side effects for the actual reasons below. If I was really ban/block evading I’d just make up an entirely new user name each time, it would be FAR more effective and longer lasting.

    • Shopping for a new home instance

    • Exploring the Threadiverse from different perspectives (the “hot” feed you see can vary quite a bit depending on the instance you’re on lol)

    • Learning that the bot intended to better interconnect instance comms may not be doing as good of a job

    • Interconnecting wayward or much smaller instances, a couple of them are missing even the big comms, one I was on the other day I needed to manual have it federate with every comm I posted to

    • For the creation of comms on fitting instances or just among a regular rotation of general instances so I’m not making a whole bunch on any one instance

    • Prevention of a reoccurrence of my imposter problem

    Trolling .ml (or Why am I cross-posting .ml content?

    I cross-post from .ml to the nearest relevant non-.ml comm to reduce the influence of .ml comms and indirectly, the instance as a whole, to make it an easier decision for other instance admins to defederate because one key reason I identified that admins don’t want to defederate is because .ml still has some very large comms and some niche comms.

    Megathread on the issue

    Some highlights from the link:

    "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

    “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

    .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 The original transphobic Comment from Nutomic: https://lemmy.world/post/18236068

    “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

    General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

    “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

    And so so much documentation on clear heavy handed censorship and bias also on the link. So much I can’t even put them all here because this comment would be really long.

    I believe the behavior of its admins (the main admins are Lemmy devs) does harm to the overall growth of the Lemmy-verse and maybe even the Thrediverse (since Lemmy kinda kicked off the Thrediverse) because of its association with the devs of Lemmy and their insistence to use .ml as their personal political platform to spread harmful propaganda

    On the outside, bringing up Lemmy frequently leads to comments like “Lemmy? Isn’t that the place with a bunch of tankies?” Or “Tried Lemmy, but found it full of pro Russia crap so I left”. The best way forward from that I see is to either widely defederate from .ml like the rest of the Triad, or pressure them to put a fair and unbiased as possible admin team. :::)

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Can you just make this easy for everyone, then, and create your own instance (which hosts the account from which all your heavy posting will come), and use your other accounts for whatever else you might want to do.

      This:

      • enables users or instances that may want to not interact with you to enact that effectively

      • allows you to see posts from and post to every instance and community which reciprocates a desire to be connected with you (or at least which doesn’t want to not be connected with you)

      All without putting the burden on others for your excessive account creation and posting.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I have no strong opinion about the user in question, but not everyone has the resources to host their own instance. In addition, from my understanding, even those who do might not be open to the burdens that come with doing so (regardless of whether they’re prolific posters).

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Hey! It’s that person they’re talking about! Seriously though, I appreciate your constant posting and keeping this site alive.

    • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      I do feel like there’s a legitimate complaint to be had that since you’re doing heavy / automated posting, it would be good to pick one and only one instance/user to do it from just to be polite to people who don’t want that, and have it blocked.

      I feel like all the weeping and gnashing of teeth that OP is doing isn’t necessary, since you’re obviously not intending it badly, but I do feel like there’s a grain of legitimacy somewhere in there.

      • cm0002@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair, though it’s definitely not automated. Heavy posting yes, automated no.

        The absolute irony here is that I actually considered this perspective weeks ago, but I figured since you can block a user in 3 clicks or less straight from the encountered post the burden of anyone out there blocking me would be low and nbd. Ig not lmao

        • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, but multiply that by the number of people who for one reason or another you just don’t want to see their content, and then multiply again by the number of instances you have your own accounts on, and I think it’s understandable for people not to want it to be multiplied again by some number of alt accounts for each poster.

          It just shouldn’t be on the individual to have to invest effort every day into that kind of thing. If it’s one account, and you just don’t vibe with it, then fine. But if it turns into an ongoing project, I do get the irritation even if the amount of effort you’re being randomly required to activate at random times is quick and trivial. Like if you just got randomly resubscribed to communities sometimes that you had unsubscribed from, and then had to unsubscribe from them again, that’s not a lot of effort to do, but the amount of effort is not the point.

  • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Okay. Looking through the comments, it doesn’t appear that you actually have anything here other than it pisses you off. But is it a problem? You’re phrasing this like cm0002 is evading bans and he isn’t. If he’s making new accounts and that annoys you then that sucks but… why do the admins need to get involved with this? You said you want to have him permabanned from an instance? Why?

    You can check who voted for a post by the way. Cm0002 doesn’t vote for himself. I have checked in the past when I first started noticing his username a lot myself. Hell, I thought he was irritating as hell for a while myself too. I guess I’m biased in the sense that I know the dude and would call him a friend but even then, I’m not seeing anything demonstrating that action needs to actually be taken by anyone.

    I get being annoyed with people. But saying that this is bad faith and worthy of having the entire username banned from the entire fucking instance seems like a massive overreach. One so far that I would just outright avoid ever posting to that instance ever again because that admin would be tripping balls and power.

    • jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have logged out and read all of the replies. I do not believe them to believe them to be truthful or in good faith based on timing alone. cm0002 made an account on an instance that was less than a day old. They even made a post about it. How in the world is that possible without automation? And to your other replies, yes, I am deliberately rocking the boat because I believe that people need to be aware that this kind of thing is possible. Also, one of the predominant complaints on Lemmy is multiple posts to many communities. I don’t think that there is a bigger offender. Many people see things multiple times and can’t stop it because of the account spam.

      I’ve calmed down a lot (re; your comment about me not being around - I needed to actually step back and get some perspective). While this was posted as a rant, I do stand by the initial points (though framing it as ban evasion was admittedly me just fuming). I should have punched a wall, or something instead - I don’t know. I’m not entirely intelligent nor emotionally stable by any means. I think something about hitting the block button one too many times made me snap.

      I really should just leave all kinds of social interactions because my brain can break like this, I guess. You’ve been fantastic to me and gave me a real shot at making good posts. My insane bipolar brain is telling me to run right now.

      • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s not automation, it’s just autism. You can see when new instances come online and he likes helping out small ones so he keeps an eye out.

        I get rocking the boat. That’s fine. I’m not saying don’t. I’m just perturbed by accusations made with zero evidence as if it’s just truth. I don’t recommend punching a wall (or running, shit happens), and ranting is what the community is there for, but question things more so than accuse.

        And while he is a friend, I’ve questioned before why he’s using so many alts and told him to chill the hell out. I also think he should on that front because I like him on lemmy otherwise. So I’m not just sitting on the sidelines completely defending him. Just… yea.

        • jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’ve talked me down on several occasions, and this should be added to them, I think. @cm002@lemmy.zip I’d like you to know that this wasn’t personal - I just got extremely frustrated, and will delete my untoward comments if you deem that I should.

      • cm0002@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        made an account on an instance that was less than a day old

        Honestly, I had no idea that they were only open for a day, I just peruse Lemmyverse.net and pick instances that seem interesting or have funny/cool sounding names 😂

      • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Rule 2. I guess you missed that part in your quest to take a screenshot. Making shit up about a user, admitting you’re making shit up about a user and doubling down with false accusations really seems like it’d violate that.

      • calliope@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Literally the entire purpose of this community.

        It’s been fun to see a lot of the major Lemmy posters show up in this thread. It’s been really eye-opening.

        • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          For someone who keeps running around this thread and saying that it’s exactly appropriate for this community, you clearly did read the second rule. It’s almost like lying about someone flinging false accusations and making shit up might violate the rule saying respect other users. Even then, my issue isn’t the rant. My issue is that this is someone who I respect and have seen on Lemmy a lot, who I’ve talked to a lot, who is making shit up, throwing a tantrum and inventing shit about someone else. I don’t care about the actions of this post. I care of the actions of this post when @jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone is better than this. This is just fucking disappointing.

    • jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      I really can’t think of a good reason to have this many active and posting accounts other than trying to get around something. I was extremely annoyed when I wrote this post, and honestly still am, hence why I posted this here. A filter per end user would be a better solution, like what PieFed has.

      I could have worded everything better. This should be a highlight of what could be done by one user.

      • calliope@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s honestly driving me crazy that people are complaining about the wording.

        You posted it here consciously, it’s a “rant” community.

        This is the right place for something like this! The way you worded it wasn’t really problematic. It may have been if it was in a different community, but people are expecting lot from a rant.

        • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          They accused another user of ban evasion, realized they were pissed, said they had zero evidence to support the accusation and repeatedly doubled down. The problem is not the wording. It’s the actively hostile intent towards another user and using the rant community to attack someone. It’s disgusting and I expect better of Jawa after everything else they’ve done on Lemmy. This some extremely shitty behavior.

          Stop trying to move the goal posts to make what is blatantly an attack post seem okay.

          • Cricket [he/him]@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Speaking of being actively hostile towards another user and lying for that purpose, have you seen the list of supposed quotes from the Lemmy devs that cm0002 keeps posting repeatedly (a few times just on this thread)? From the couple I checked, those do not at all appear to be direct quotes, even though he makes it appear as though they are. That seems to me to be against many instances’ rules?

            • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Whataboutism. One accusation with some merit (whether or not it even has any, I have no idea because I haven’t looked into it) does not mean that another one suddenly gets any. I am also not having a discussion about that. I am having a discussion about the fact that false accusations were slung with zero evidence. Make your own post if you feel that strongly about it and actually have evidence.

              Edit: Yeah, I looked at the quotes. They’re clearly facetious and provide the actual link to the direct quote. Your complaint is worthless. If you have nothing valuable to add then it’s perfectly legitimate to say nothing. Highly recommend it sometime.

      • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I really can’t think of a good reason to have this many active and posting accounts other than trying to get around something.

        I can’t think of a lot of things too. Doesn’t mean those reasons don’t exist. He’s also actively given reasons in this thread. I’d suggest logging out and checking it or something else. Moreover, unless you have something to point to then the accusation is kind of reductive and harmful. You’re claiming he’s evading bans but have provided exactly zero evidence of this. 5 hours later, you’ve still not updated the post to remove the ban evasion claim or provide any evidence of it. I’ma be real… I find your behavior to be WAY more problematic than his. What’s he doing? Making multiple accounts and annoying you. What are you doing? Making a large thread firing accusations at someone with exactly zero evidence.

        I was extremely annoyed when I wrote this post, and honestly still am, hence why I posted this here.

        That doesn’t justify firing false accusations at someone. Questioning if someone does it is fine. You didn’t do that though. You outright said this was ban evasion tactics and that makes me feel really gross. I get your frustrations and I’m not minizing them but you’ve framed your frustrations and suspicions as fact, providing nothing to back yourself up other than the thing that annoys you and keep firing that same accusation by being aware of the wording error and not fixing it.

        This whole thread is… kind of gross. I’m not going to lie. I’m not a big fan of not liking a thing and then presenting my hunch as outright fact. I go out of my way to look for things that might point towards it and will at the very least add that. Add supporting evidence for the argument. This is just a personal complaint that’s been framed as an attack on another user and I’m not exactly a fan.

        • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          To me it seems mostly as a method to obscure post history. It’s the other side of the coin of users who delete everything 24-48 hours afterwards. Incredibly annoying and only leads me to feel suspicious.

          After all, you’ll note how quick the user is to dive into post histories and theorycraft on who is whose alt accounts. The notion that there’s something to be found in there is some kind of projection for sure.

          • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Your feelings are irrelevant unless you have evidence. Your hunch is irrelevant unless you have proof. I am not a 14 year old interested in gossip.

            • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              It was going on in the main/top thread of this topic when I opened it. Linking this thread would seem unnecessary? First reply to hamid by cm002 in this post is calling them an alt of another user?

              *edit Did you believe I was referring to you? I was referring to the cm002 user, not you.

              • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Did you believe I was referring to you? I was referring to the cm002 user, not you.

                Like I said. Your feelings are irrelevant unless you have proof. Saying something feels a certain way is useless and doesn’t add anything to the conversation. It’s just nonsense accusations based off of your feelings.

      • sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have a bunch of accounts on different instances because (1) different instances are specialized in different topics, (2) different instances federate differently so I see different posts and comments, and (3) if I want to see the local feed for an instance on my app , the easiest way is to make an account on that instance.

        Honestly, if I wanted to browse the local feeds on twenty different instances I’d probably have twenty different accounts saved on my app, and probably not be too worried about which one i posted with where 😆

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      It very clearly is ban evasion. At the same time the Lemmyverse does fundamentally not have the ability to stop this.

      • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        It very clearly is ban evasion.

        Prove it. “Very Clearly” is worth nothing. A hunch is worth nothing. If you don’t have something to actively point towards for that accusation, then it’s just a false accusation. Considering that he hasn’t been posting to places he’s been banned from, and the fact that it’s the same username so it is flat out idiotic to use the exact same username repeatedly if he’s trying to do that, your accusation doesn’t seem to have anything to stand on.

        At the same time the Lemmyverse does fundamentally not have the ability to stop this.

        Which, as we’ve established, is not actually problematic. Just annoying. Otherwise you’d all be linking to examples of him doing the things you’re claiming.

        • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I am pretty sure this user in question is the same that has made previous demands the Lemmy devs ‘sell’ the code to an independent third party like some kind of IMF loan situation. There’s a level of dedication against the platform itself that exists.

          I had always assumed they’d just gone over to piefed and put their crusade to rest.

          • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            So you still don’t have any evidence and everything that you’re saying is completely and utterly worthless?

            Thank you for your input.

            Go away.

            • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              There was a petition posted awhile back about wanting the Lemmy devs to give away control over the code because of their politics. I will see if I can find it but I think it was over a year ago at this point. I am almost positive it was cm002, but I’ll see if I can find that thread. No harm in seeing if my recollection is accurate.

              • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I will see if I can find it

                I am almost positive

                I’ll see if I can find that thread

                No harm in seeing if my recollection is accurate

                Then go ahead and do that. But as it currently stands, you are just firing accusations with nothing other than “I think” and “I feel”. You might as well be a republican.

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      just constantly stealing other people’s content

      That’s what bothers me.

      The constant reposts have made it more difficult to find the original content. At the very least put where it’s from in the body or something so I can look there

      • cm0002@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        All of my crossposts should show in the cross post menu, OC is additionally tagged with the username

        Like this:

        Why am I cross-posting .ml content?

        I cross-post from .ml to the nearest relevant non-.ml comm to reduce the influence of .ml comms and indirectly, the instance as a whole, to make it an easier decision for other instance admins to defederate because one key reason I identified that admins don’t want to defederate is because .ml still has some very large comms and some niche comms.

        Megathread on the issue

        Some highlights from the link:

        "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

        “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

        .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 The original transphobic Comment from Nutomic: https://lemmy.world/post/18236068

        “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

        General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

        “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

        And so so much documentation on clear heavy handed censorship and bias also on the link. So much I can’t even put them all here because this comment would be really long.

        I believe the behavior of its admins (the main admins are Lemmy devs) does harm to the overall growth of the Lemmy-verse and maybe even the Thrediverse (since Lemmy kinda kicked off the Thrediverse) because of its association with the devs of Lemmy and their insistence to use .ml as their personal political platform to spread harmful propaganda

        On the outside, bringing up Lemmy frequently leads to comments like “Lemmy? Isn’t that the place with a bunch of tankies?” Or “Tried Lemmy, but found it full of pro Russia crap so I left”. The best way forward from that I see is to either widely defederate from .ml like the rest of the Triad, or pressure them to put a fair and unbiased as possible admin team.

        • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah. .ml is a massive shithole. I don’t honestly know why everyone hasn’t blacklisted them.

          • cm0002@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Fear of retaliation in the form of withheld support from dessalines or “slow walked” at the very least.

            • hatorade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Has Dessalines actually done that? Its open source, so if .ml got an update, anyone could just take it back.

            • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, they’re petty enough to do just that. Of course if anyone questioned why, I’m sure their excuse would be “Rule 1”.

    • cm0002@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago
      Why am I cross-posting .ml content?

      I cross-post from .ml to the nearest relevant non-.ml comm to reduce the influence of .ml comms and indirectly, the instance as a whole, to make it an easier decision for other instance admins to defederate because one key reason I identified that admins don’t want to defederate is because .ml still has some very large comms and some niche comms.

      Megathread on the issue

      Some highlights from the link:

      "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

      “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

      .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 The original transphobic Comment from Nutomic: https://lemmy.world/post/18236068

      “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

      General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

      “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

      And so so much documentation on clear heavy handed censorship and bias also on the link. So much I can’t even put them all here because this comment would be really long.

      I believe the behavior of its admins (the main admins are Lemmy devs) does harm to the overall growth of the Lemmy-verse and maybe even the Thrediverse (since Lemmy kinda kicked off the Thrediverse) because of its association with the devs of Lemmy and their insistence to use .ml as their personal political platform to spread harmful propaganda

      On the outside, bringing up Lemmy frequently leads to comments like “Lemmy? Isn’t that the place with a bunch of tankies?” Or “Tried Lemmy, but found it full of pro Russia crap so I left”. The best way forward from that I see is to either widely defederate from .ml like the rest of the Triad, or pressure them to put a fair and unbiased as possible admin team.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Wait, are people just getting mad at you because you crosspost from .ml instances? You are doing the Flying Sphaguetti Monster’s work.

        • cm0002@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yea pretty much, .ml defenders or ideology aligned people for sure

          There’s also a group on Lemmy who hate power posters and only want to see people that post handcrafted artisan posts and not articles or memes. Which is baffling because Lemmy/PieFed/Reddit are all of social media type known as link aggregators LMAO

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Could users request to be added to your block list? Which you could copy over when creating new accounts.

        Maybe a dumb one here but came to mind :)

        • cm0002@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Lemmy blocking system is very half baked, possibly intentionally, and doesn’t work in this manner. Blocks on my side only prevent me from seeing them, but they will still see (and be able to interact with, which is the big problem with it) my posts/comments

          Otherwise I would totally do this lol

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    proof that it is high time that an instance needs the ability to straight up perma ban a username

    This wouldn’t solve the problem. They’d just roll in with cm0003. You need an IP ban or some similar source specific censorship. Even then, it’s a moving target when the end user is determined enough.

    • green_copper@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      You need an IP ban or some similar source specific censorship

      CG NAT and VPNs want to have a word with you.

        • green_copper@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          This doesn’t need much determination. And especially with CG NAT you would IP ban not only one person, but a whole block or even district of persons.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Most trolls don’t even know what those are, though. And in my experience, making an account somewhere else is more effort than 99.9% put in already.

  • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 days ago

    ?

    1. Definitely not every post of theirs is upvoted (see links below). Do you have one that you feel like the voting for was probably fraudulent or something?
    2. He is vocally against lemmy.ml and reposts their content sometimes to encourage people to move off that server. What’s your take on that? Does he repost anything outside of that one example that you know of?
    3. Do people ban this person? Literally all he does is post, as far as I can tell… like I looked over the user pages 1 2 3 4 5 and it’s just kind of normal stuff to me.
    4. It’s a little weird that he has so many accounts. @cm0002@lemmy.zip why do you have so many accounts? It is a little weird and makes it more difficult for people who want to block you, I get that part of what OP is saying, just all the rest of it like you’re doing some kind of wild out-of-pocket thing by posting the stuff you post seems all the way out of left field to me.
    • cm0002@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I have reasons, I’ll just copy paste a previous response:

      For other people blocking me, I don’t really care if they do or don’t, it’s just unfortunate unintended side effects for the actual reasons:

      Shopping for a new home instance

      Exploring the Threadiverse from different perspectives (the “hot” feed you see can vary quite a bit depending on the instance you’re on lol)

      Learning that the bot intended to better interconnect instance comms may not be doing as good of a job

      Interconnecting wayward or much smaller instances, a couple of them are missing even the big comms, one I was on the other day I needed to manual have it federate with every comm I posted to

      For the creation of comms on fitting instances or just among a regular rotation of general instances so I’m not making a whole bunch on any one instance

      Trolling .ml (or Why am I cross-posting .ml content?

      I cross-post from .ml to the nearest relevant non-.ml comm to reduce the influence of .ml comms and indirectly, the instance as a whole, to make it an easier decision for other instance admins to defederate because one key reason I identified that admins don’t want to defederate is because .ml still has some very large comms and some niche comms.

      Megathread on the issue

      Some highlights from the link:

      "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

      “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

      .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 The original transphobic Comment from Nutomic: https://lemmy.world/post/18236068

      “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

      General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

      “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

      And so so much documentation on clear heavy handed censorship and bias also on the link. So much I can’t even put them all here because this comment would be really long.

      I believe the behavior of its admins (the main admins are Lemmy devs) does harm to the overall growth of the Lemmy-verse and maybe even the Thrediverse (since Lemmy kinda kicked off the Thrediverse) because of its association with the devs of Lemmy and their insistence to use .ml as their personal political platform to spread harmful propaganda

      On the outside, bringing up Lemmy frequently leads to comments like “Lemmy? Isn’t that the place with a bunch of tankies?” Or “Tried Lemmy, but found it full of pro Russia crap so I left”. The best way forward from that I see is to either widely defederate from .ml like the rest of the Triad, or pressure them to put a fair and unbiased as possible admin team. :::)

      • Cricket [he/him]@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m just finally looking at those links that you list. Based on just the first couple of “quotes”, they’re not direct quotes but your interpretation of what they’re saying. I get it that you hate lemmy.ml and the Lemmy devs, but this is pretty poor behavior to claim that those are direct quotes.

        • cm0002@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “Uyghur atrocity propaganda equate birth control with genocide.” Is his literal words for the first one, some are memes and you almost have to interpret into a quote. How do you directly quote a meme?

          Besides, here’s one that just happened earlier today, no quotes no interpretation other than saying what happened (banning people who call out Russian propaganda): https://lemmy.zip/post/53268068

          And those are only highlights, the megathread has many MANY examples

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      I did notice the sudden influx of new accounts under the cm0002 name, I wasn’t entirely sure it’s actually the same guy or somebody impersonating him. I don’t see why he’d need that many, and most of the accounts are very new despite him having been around for a long time.

      • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, that’s a good point. @OP that is one reason for making it not work the way you describe, it makes it super-easy to destroy any user just by making new alts with their same name and then having them be obnoxious. IDK what the fix is really, it is a real problem that people can make alts to do ban evasion.

        @cm0002@lemmy.world I should ask also, are all the described alts actually you?

        • cm0002@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          Most are, but I have had an impersonation problem in the past, so there are a few imposter accounts mixed in there. This is another reason to have these accounts, prevention of it happening again.

          @Snowpix@lemmy.ca

          • idunnololz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thats actually what I guessed was happening. Sometimes I make accounts on services I don’t use just to “reserve” the username.

    • jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Saying every post was admittedly hyperbolic. Saying “many” would have been more appropriate I agree. I am well aware of the vendetta against ml. The point here is that even if someone attempts to ban or block them, the effort is immediately bypassed.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        The way your post was making it out to seem, “forces an instance to federate out” sounded like he was doing something so egregious that he was forcing instances to be defederated, sheesh. On the bright side, you’ve Barbara Streissanded his good work.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          A user, yes. But having to do it constantly as you continue to re-create accounts on every instance you can find is another matter.