• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    China’s socialist market economy, unlike FDR’s New Deal, is commanded by public ownership as the principle aspect of the economy under a proletarian-led and controlled state, unlike FDR’s bourgeois controlled imperialist state. Socialism isn’t simply having safety nets, it’s a mode of production.

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Totally, totally. Those are the nets I think of when i think of their production. Very proletarian led, that’s why they need all the cops and censorship.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Those are the nets I think of when i think of their production.

        It’s weird how liberals will insist “one county, two systems” is a fiction, then point to a glaring example of Hong Kong labor policy and blame Beijing.

        Nevermind the fact that you’re describing Foxcon, a Taiwanese company focused on manufacturing for American and Japanese electronics distributed into Western markets.

        That’s the evil Chinese Communism you’re complaining about. No word on when Americans plan to sanction Foxcon for these abhorrent labor practices.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Over 90% of the Chinese citizenry support their system, and the vast majority believe it to be democratic, more confidence than westerners have in their system. Having police and censoring the speech of capitalists is important for upholding the socialist project, especially in its early stages as it is in China.