The whole point is de-anonymizing and directly censoring. Why would they protect children in any way? They’ll mostly die in wars in a few years anyway, fighting for the elites.
Depending on your bar for aggression, they already are. Migrants are explicitly left to die in the Mediterranean in the thousands while nation-scale resources are used to rescue one (1) billionaire submarine.
All right. Now, let’s talk about how that’s going to be enforced without de-anonymizing Internet discourse.
Probably by de-anonymizing internet discourse.
The whole point is de-anonymizing and directly censoring. Why would they protect children in any way? They’ll mostly die in wars in a few years anyway, fighting for the elites.
I don’t see European nations being the aggressor in the next 30 years to be honest.
Might be a bit optimistic, given Europe’s continuing slide into fascism.
Airstrip one has always been at war with Eurasia.
Depending on your bar for aggression, they already are. Migrants are explicitly left to die in the Mediterranean in the thousands while nation-scale resources are used to rescue one (1) billionaire submarine.