• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    None of these corporations ever cared and only ever did the bare minimum. Now they don’t even have to do the bare minimum. Even with backlash this will still be a net gain for them.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have been disappointed that Zillow did not add climate risk as a filter. Zillow’s announcement is regressive.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t see this as a big deal. We all pretty much know what we’re in for, even if we’re not familiar with the area. You know Texas is hot, California catches fire and the Gulf Coast catches hurricanes.

    In any case, I wouldn’t trust a private company’s data on climate risks. If I’m considering such a huge spend, going to do some due diligence. FEMA gave me a flood map in seconds, free.

    Kinda funny the realtors backed Zillow up on this. Zillow should have told them to get bent, we need this because our competition has it. What are they gonna do? Not use Zillow? 😆

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    zillow is primarily a tech company. and it’s run by incompetent techbros who should have been fired the instant they laid people off for no reason other than moronic executive decisions had predictably disastrous outcomes (Zillow Offers)