• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    what is beautiful is political. Valuing art based on beauty is political. Maybe your friend is ugly. Maybe they are not, and that’s why the portrait was done.

    The act of creating is expressing power, and the expression of power and choices about who and what is valued is the core of “political.”

    It isn’t always a clear cut thing, sometimes it’s a deeper philosophical idea and much less on the surface.

    Maybe “political” is too far and “a collection of choices that reflect and potentially propagate culture or societal beliefs.” Is better.

    Being able to make a choice is power. However small. And politics is all about power. Art is all about choices.

    • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, sure, but that absolutely devalues the meaning of the word. Absolutely every single thing you do is preceeded by a choice to do that, and choices are reflective of ones inner self, and if making a choice is power, and politics is all about power, then every single thing you do is political. Waking up before sunrise is political, waking up later is political, saying hello to your neighbour is political. Recording a guitar riff that just sounds cool is political. I created croissants yesterday, that was political.

      Words are created to be used, and “political” cannot be used in any meaningful way if it refers to everything. While you probably could soundly argue that a child drawing random lines with crayons is political, it’s really pointless since it’s just pedantry that doesn’t add value, but rather devalues the word.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did agree that using that word is probably going to far. I was merely trying to elaborate on the sentiment you were rejecting.