A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.


As is tradition, at around this time of year, we discuss the latest developments in the communist plan to destroy Christmas and everything festive and jolly - including that bastard kulak Santa Claus. Down with holly and myrrh, and up with historical materialism!

This year, I’m highlighting the economic trend of de-Decemberization, as the world struggles to break free from the seasonal hegemony imposed by the North Pole. Some regard it as a rather overhyped phenomenon, stating that the chains of Christmas are too frozen for any country to thaw and break in the current environment. Others are more optimistic, and assert that perhaps an alternative world holiday could be established to outright replace it, or maybe a series of smaller holiday traditions can bring it down like a pack of wolves bringing down a moose.

To return to seriousness, as this year draws to a close, I hope everybody here - yes, also you, the person reading this - has a 2026 that was better than 2025, and that the efforts of the United States and their proxies are foiled at every turn. One day, humans will live in a world free from empires, and it would be nice if as many of us as possible lived to see that world’s birth.

At the very least, I’d like to live to see an aircraft carrier sink beneath the waves.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    interesting comment I came across about the famines in China and the US’s role in them: https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/1pnb0md/china_starts_building_nuclearpowered_supercarrier/nujmfoj/

    more

    In the 50s (up til 1972), the US led a total embargo on China, including a food and fertilizer embargo in the express goal of causing a famine that would lead to regime change. By 1959, China’s grain reserves were low and production was not capable of keeping up. It was clear to the CCP that things were heading to an upcoming famine, without imports to cushion the upcoming deficit. Here’s a breakdown of the factors:

    • Poor weather leading to poor crop yields. This was the biggest factor despite mainstream rhetoric both in China and abroad: «The Economic Situation in Communist China», Apr 4 1961. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0001098172.pdf (p.3 paragraph 13, or p.5 of pdf file). Both the West and Chinese successors of Mao (who were of an opposing faction to him) have very good political reasons to blame him for everything.
    • Bad policies leading to poor crop yields: the infamous Four Pest Campaign. While not the main factor for the poor crop yield as modern rhetoric claims, it remained a significant factor. (Same CIA document addresses this in paragraph 14)
    • Rampant population growth. The same CIA document, in paragraph 9, notes that agricultural production actually increased in China from 168 to 185 million tons, just not enough to keep up with population growth
    • Bad policies leading to poor grain reserves: in 1958, (same CIA document, paragraph 9), grain production increased to 212 million tons. However, CCP allowed free supply of food in the communes’ mess halls instead of its usual rationing, which led to depleting reserves instead of padding it despite a good year.
    • Bad policies leading to poor grain reserves: as a rule, China was a food exporter instead of a food importer in the 50s prior to the famine, as it required capital for its industrialization and had little else to offer that other nations would buy. This wasn’t an inherently bad tradeoff (a similar kind of tradeoff would lead to China’s rise as a nation), but became one due to CCP not keeping enough grain reserves that could account for 3 consecutive bad years.

    It was therefore in 1959 that the CCP started negotiating grain purchases with Western nations that had a surplus, but they were resisting at that point due to US-led embargo. (The US put significant pressure on its allies to comply with the embargo) https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/an-era-ends-as-china-becomes-an-aid-donor/article978192/ (paywall. Mirror: https://archive.is/9Ksoq). The famine happened as engineered by the US despite CCP’s efforts in preventing it (both in attempting to purchase grain and in transporting their available food around to lower death toll). Death tolls are likely exaggerated (all state actors around the world had reason to, again due to political expediency vis-à-vis Mao), but the famine did indeed happen. The lowest estimates are around 5 million (figure Mao gave to US diplomats), up to 30 something million (extremely unlikely).

    After the famine worsened in winter 1961, Canada and Australia had enough of being complicit in genocide and decided to defy the US embargo and sent China grain (both paid and given). This was sufficient to stop the famine and bought them considerable goodwill from the PRC for a few decades. At this point, the CIA calculated that if Canadian and Australian grain imports stopped, it would be enough to send China back into the worst parts of the famine (thereby confirming that if grain imports started in 1959, there wouldn’t have been a famine to begin with). It then lamented at the poor cooperation of US allies in this attempted genocide in the CIA report «Communist China: Economic Performance in 1962», Dec 3 1962. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000402879.pdf (p.8-9; or p.10-11 of pdf file).

    Side note that doesn’t really affect how the events unfolded in either CCP actions nor US intentions: In February 1961, the CCP expressed a need for urgent grain purchases to the Soviet Union. Khrushchev offered 1 million tons of grain and half a million tons of Cuban sugar on a loan basis. China agreed to use the sugar loan and asked to keep the grain offer in reserve (Lorentz M. Lüthi’s book «The Sino-Soviet Split»). It then however used part of the offer soon after (200 000 tons, according to Barbara Barnouin in «Zhou Enlai: A Political Life»). This was shortly before the Sino-Soviet split was complete. The loan was paid back with Canadian grain. That China negotiated for grain from Canada in 1959, and only from the Soviets in 1961 after the famine got really bad, spoke volumes about how bad Sino-Soviet relations were at that point. Also, it is probably slightly unfair to say that CCP successors to Mao blamed him solely for political expediency; there was good grounds to say if CCP did not make the numerous poor policy decisions listed above, the famine may not have happened (or at least not have been as bad) despite the poor weather and the US genocide attempt. CCP is inherently pragmatic and considers being able to weather both natural disasters and hostile factors its mandate. This was likely a large part of why it declared the GLF famine “mostly man-made [by itself]” despite the fact that the men that intentionally made the famine were in Washington and not Beijing.


    from the linked CIA doc:

    Failure to import 5 million mt of grain in 1963 might reduce by 3 to 4 percent the total caloric availability, thereby diminishing labor productivity … and causing increased rural dissatisfaction. … The cumulative effects of prolonged malnutrition … could lead to a level of unrest that would tax the police powers of the regime.

    • Rampant population growth. The same CIA document, in paragraph 9, notes that agricultural production actually increased in China from 168 to 185 million tons, just not enough to keep up with population growth Bad policies leading to poor grain reserves: in 1958, (same CIA document, paragraph 9), grain production increased to 212 million tons. However, CCP allowed free supply of food in the communes’ mess halls instead of its usual rationing, which led to depleting reserves instead of padding it despite a good year.

      Idk, it sounds like it leers a bit to Malthusian-aligned rhetoric, but what do I know…

      • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I mean, the trouble was that China was also exporting food and trying to develop other sectors of the economy - if they were staying as a purely agricultural economy and keeping most of the output for domestic consumption, crop production would have likely been able to keep up.

        Most industrializing countries import food, since they can no longer function like medieval economies and dedicate like 90% of the population to agriculture. It’s just that the Western colonial powers were able to violently extract their food from elsewhere - British industrialization also had famines, just in India (and more infamously, Ireland) instead of Britain.

        Having to export crops in order to raise capital was also a contributing factor to the famines in the early Soviet Union - again, if they didn’t industrialize and didn’t export that likely wouldn’t have happened (or at least would have been much less severe). But an un-industrialized Soviet Union is one which cannot resist the Nazis effectively and is genocided, so industrialization was of the utmost priority - the Bolsheviks were made aware quite immediately that the capitalist powers wouldn’t just let them be.

        • I mean, the trouble was that China was also exporting food and trying to develop other sectors of the economy - if they were staying as a purely agricultural economy and keeping most of the output for domestic consumption, crop production would have likely been able to keep up.

          Oh ok, I see hmmm… now that I think of the patterns…