ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agoIt happened again rulediscuss.onlineimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1639
arrow-up1639imageIt happened again rulediscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squaremuusemuuse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·11 hours agoYou don’t need to see the content on the phone just identify individual phones there. They are accessing certain things you don’t need to see the message being transmitted to make your point.
minus-squareforwhomthecattolls@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 hours agogood point! an IMSI catcher without MiTM capability would do the trick, you don’t need to decrypt traffic to have the intended effect
You don’t need to see the content on the phone just identify individual phones there. They are accessing certain things you don’t need to see the message being transmitted to make your point.
good point! an IMSI catcher without MiTM capability would do the trick, you don’t need to decrypt traffic to have the intended effect