• Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    They wake up every day and try to decide how to lose users. From killing things to enshittifying them.

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      To be fair, they’re only talking about being able to fetch other (third party) mail accounts via Gmail. No one in their right mind should be doing this anyway. And only via POP3, IMAP is still supported.

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Google are an advertisement company. Their business model is data mining. It should be an inconvenience for them to build a profile on you. Running your third party email via them is the opposite of that.

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It sounds remarkably janky, and a bit of an unusual edge case. Why would someone need this specific pattern?

          Eventually this is the sort of thing that isn’t worth supporting.

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I used to do it back when gmail first started, I connected it to my previous email account so anything addressed to my old account would get transferred to my new one.

            I could probably count the number of emails it ever retrieved on one hand.

              • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                That’s the point of the feature though. POP3 moves emails, it’s really a transfer protocol rather than an access protocol.

                I assume Google is killing it since they assume they’re effectively in-charge of email outside of things like company Outlook accounts. They’ve got no need to worry about people migrating to gmail, since everybody starts out on it now.

          • eleijeep@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yes just like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, telnet and all the other pre-TLS protocols that we now run over TLS for exactly this reason.

            Google, just like every other modern mail client, supports connecting to POP3 servers over SSL:

            WDLrB05Knrl5Z0M.png

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think they calculate what they can change that loses less users than it gains in advertising revenue. Just slowly turning the screws more and more.

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s probably someone going for promo by removing this feature. Doubt it affects the bottom line much, just reduces complexity.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    IIRC, POP3 downloaded all emails to local device. If you have more than one device, the first one gets it all and the second or more see nothing.

    IMAP kept the messages on the server so there was one source of truth and multiple devices could access the same emails.

    Most email clients support both. There are probably some people still running old POP3 clients, or they set it up one way and never bothered to change.

    Not sure why gmail would care. Code’s been working for decades. Unless there are security considerations not worth mitigating.