Management is correct if they think ‘it’s ready to do the thing they’re literally trained to do, which is punish labor’.
That’s exactly my point. I don’t think they’re just bumbling and tripping into this. Regardless of the competence of the manager, the result is the same. I know managers who know exactly how shitty the slop toasters do the work of their people, and they also know that the hard work is actually done by those under them. But AI is useful to say ‘but AI means I don’t have to pay you as much, and if you don’t believe me, try the next company.’
It’s bigger than incompetent managers, and it’s led by a competent system that we need to confront. I don’t like acting like our enemies are incompetent when they are either very competent at this or exist in a system that acts as if it is competent.
Acting like managers are just incompetent can make workers angry, and that has its uses. But I think it’s much more valuable to act like they’re very competent but evil.
Some are competent, but generally they’re only competent as a subclass of class traitor. In terms of competence as workers, they’re almost always significantly lacking. Though are meant to pretend to be.
The AI thing it’s, on a whole, a drive to break up labor. But on an individual level, as workers interact with that system, it’s largely managers that are adopting it due to their incompetence and fear of their staff.
I think the current drive is meant to be wholly threat based, if they were acting properly, they wouldn’t do me layoffs. They’d instead slow hiring and put the monster next to everyone. When they play their hand and actually try and replace people with it, it breaks everything and ruins the illusion.
Management is correct if they think ‘it’s ready to do the thing they’re literally trained to do, which is punish labor’.
That’s exactly my point. I don’t think they’re just bumbling and tripping into this. Regardless of the competence of the manager, the result is the same. I know managers who know exactly how shitty the slop toasters do the work of their people, and they also know that the hard work is actually done by those under them. But AI is useful to say ‘but AI means I don’t have to pay you as much, and if you don’t believe me, try the next company.’
It’s bigger than incompetent managers, and it’s led by a competent system that we need to confront. I don’t like acting like our enemies are incompetent when they are either very competent at this or exist in a system that acts as if it is competent.
Acting like managers are just incompetent can make workers angry, and that has its uses. But I think it’s much more valuable to act like they’re very competent but evil.
Some are competent, but generally they’re only competent as a subclass of class traitor. In terms of competence as workers, they’re almost always significantly lacking. Though are meant to pretend to be.
The AI thing it’s, on a whole, a drive to break up labor. But on an individual level, as workers interact with that system, it’s largely managers that are adopting it due to their incompetence and fear of their staff.
I think the current drive is meant to be wholly threat based, if they were acting properly, they wouldn’t do me layoffs. They’d instead slow hiring and put the monster next to everyone. When they play their hand and actually try and replace people with it, it breaks everything and ruins the illusion.