• Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    I wouldnt consider what Alberta is doing as causal, it’s a coordinated efferts to try and a ex the Provence to fit America wishes, I would consider that treasonous, you can got to court about it but I’d think they’d lose.

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I’m describing Eby’s use of the word casual, as I don’t think he, as an elected official, should be accusing people of crimes - especially those with an extraordinarily high bar.

      Do I think the Alberta separatists are wrong? Yes.

      Do I consider it a betrayal? Yes.

      Am I fine with the average person on the street using the word “treason” to describe it. Sure.

      Do I think elected officials should do the same? No.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        while i think there’s a point to that, there’s also the time that leaders need to put voice to what the people are feeling, and using colloquial terms is more effective. in the legislative, judicial and other governmental chambers, yeah pedantry is important. official edicts, also.

        sometimes you need to be able to look at your elected officials and see them saying “shit is fucked yo” too instead of “now this is improper”