• E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you change to different centralized payment systems, they will eventually devolve into oligopolies/monopoly as well. In order to make a final solution that works forever, you need a free/open protocol like GNU_Taler

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yet your elected officials are trying to force a digital ID through Zionist Larry Ellisons company Oracle onto the EU populace so it’s a little hard to believe they are going to do anything to challenge the powers that be.

    • NorskSud@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Could you say the same thing minus the antissemitism? Of course, but wouldn’t be the same, would it?

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        A religion is not a country. If a country is based on extermination and apartheid of people who do not meet their ethnic and religious requirements that country is in the wrong. Zionism is not representative of a religion anymore than nazism is representative of people who have a genetics tied to Germany. If you were against Nazi ideology are you against Germans? Your argument makes no sense and your claim that criticism of war crimes of a country following a very dangerous ideology are representative of an entire religion is offensive and I know for a fact that a lot of the Jewish community vocally does not not appreciate your argument or want to be tied to the toxic ideology of Zionism.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It would get stuck in endless debate over whether John Deere should be allowed to sell things because someone from Israel bought a tractor once.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    More banks and businesses should support Taler.

    If Visa/Mastercard get replaced by another company’s centralized payment system, what prevent a large foreign corp from buying it, like they regularily do? Then we’re back to square one.

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Every country in Europe has its own payment system, that’s kind of the whole point

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Italy has Bancomat, but still. We need a system that’s interoperable in the whole Europe.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And neither has a card available, they’re more of a convenient frontend for your regular ol’ bank transfers.

    • stormeuh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Those are owned by the major banks, European banks, sure, but still private. Payment systems like these operate like private tax collection, levying a regressive tax on all transactions which flow through them. That’s from transaction fees which exceed the cost of processing said transaction.

      I would much rather have a state-owned payment processor, which operates at cost, or is even completely funded by taxes. The extra tax revenue that would generate from increased economic activity would far outweigh its cost.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    How the fuck does Europe not have it’s own payment system yet?

    For one, visa and all the other US payment systems, suuuuuck. I never understood why nobody came up with something better, this just seems lazyness.

    Buy hey, better late than never

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How the fuck does Europe not have it’s own payment system yet?

      Europe has everything of its own. But it’s almost always country-specific.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      The actual answer: they did.

      The chip payment standard used on modern cards and terminals falls under a specification called “EMV”, which was name after the three companies that made the standard - Europay, MasterCard and Visa.

      Europay merged with MasterCard in 2002.

      Source: used to write software to validate and test EMV.

      Also the US payment systems and the European payment systems are identical (same standard) but implemented badly in the US, that’s why it’s much faster in Europe. I have several war stories about all this.

        • Kushan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ll give you a fun one.

          A point of clarification before I begin though - when I talk about chip cards or smart cards, I mean cards equipped with an EMV chip in them. The USA was one of the last countries to adopt this technology, only doing so roughly in the last 10 or so years. The technology has existed since the 90’s (when Europay still existed) and gets regular updates to add new encryption schemes and security gubbins, so while it’s 90’s technology, it has been updated since (Today’s cards use AES and ECC).

          Prior to that adoption, the USA basically refused to use them because of the cost (Cost of cards, cost of new terminals, cost of upgrading legacy infrastructure), however they wanted all the modern conveniences like contactless payments - so those first contactless cards were equipped with simple RFID chips. You know the kind, the ones that just spew out static data. Those are the ones the Mythbusters guys investigated and were forced to not air their findings because they’re so dogshit insecure (and where the idea of someone walking down the street with a big RFID reader hoovering up credit cards comes from).

          With an EMV chip card, you can’t do that. Those chips are like mini computers, they don’t just spew out static data like your card number, they do challenges and responses, they do encryption, MAC’s, the works. They really are quite secure. A transaction works in such a way that the card doesn’t trust the terminal and the terminal doesn’t trust the card, they validate each other and at any time either of them can say “Nah fuck this, I want to talk to the Bank” - this is called “going online” and if that doesn’t work, the transaction is aborted.

          The point of all of this preamble is to say that it’s actually really difficult to perform fraud on a proper chip card (And again I’m talking about EMV chips, not RFID chips). Not impossible, but very difficult to the point where it’s usually not worth it.

          So, to try and push adoption of the EMV standard in the USA, the big issuers (Your Mastercards and your Visas) tried to push what they termed the “Liability shift”. To put it simply, they’d say something like “If you don’t support EMV by November 15th, any fraud in your shop/bank/whatever will come out of your pockets, not ours”. Meanwhile, they charged a fee (like 2%) on every transaction to cover fraud. So as a shopkeeper, you’d lose an extra 2% (or whatever it was) on every sale, but if someone came in and bought 10 big-assed TV’s using a stolen or cloned card, you didn’t lose that money.

          The problem is, no shops or businesses were going to upgrade all their equipment any time soon and certainly not before their banks could support it. Likewise the banks didn’t want to spend all that money and then tell their clients to buy all new equipment - they were afraid of losing customers because why would a customer spend thousands on a new terminal to stick with the same bank, they may as well shop around.

          This weird stalemate meant that adoption was basically nill, so the issuers had to keep pushing back the liability shift over and over. Each time they got a little bit firmer, a sort of “Okay it’s now October next year before you need to adopt EMV but this time we mean it for realsies!”. This went on for YEARS and years until one day, Mastercard decided “you know what, fuck it, we’re not going to bother at all”. It turns out, those fees for protecting against fraud? They were lucrative. They made shitloads of money from it, way more than what the actual fraud was costing them.

          We got told in advance that an announcement was going to go out - pushing back the liability shift “Indefinitely”, which was a real bummer for us because we were about to make shitloads of money selling testing tools and equipment to every fucker who suddenly needed to adopt EMV. Then, literally like 4 days before that announcement was due, a miracle happened - Target got hacked.

          Yes, that target hack from 2013 where like 40 million credit cards were leaked onto the internet. The hack that made national news for weeks, the one that rustled the jimmies of everyone who had ever set foot inside a target. There was the biggest credit card breach on record, costing hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud and untold bad blood for tens of millions of customers and Mastercard was about to make an announcement to the effect of “Hey we’re going to cancel the one thing that would have prevented all this impending fraud from ever being able to happen”.

          Yeah, they didn’t make that announcement. Instead, they put their foot down and suddenly the USA woke the fuck up and decided to finally adopt chip card technology.

          (And of course they did a shit job of it, but that’s another story for another day).

    • cnovel@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      France still has one. It’s called CB (Carte Bleue) and is working alongside Visa and Mastercard. Notoriously, some years ago Visa was down for a day and it impacted lots of countries except France because everyone fell back to the CB Network.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Also in Italy with Bancomat. But still, wouldn’t it be nice if you could use a European card across all Europe?

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A lot of countries in Europe have widely used country-specific payment systems.

      The problem is those which don’t as well as the system of one country not being usable in other European countries so it falls back to VISA or Mastercard to use your card when abroad or for online purchases from businesses based in other countries.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Canada seriously needs this too. While we do have Interac for debit I much prefer the safety of a credit card after several relatives have had their cards skimmed etc

      Hell, if they started with a “Canada only” card I’d be 100% ok with that as my primary

    • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The advantage of Visa/Mastercard is that they work anywhere.

      Europeans are rich and like to travel all over the world, so they want their cards to work everywhere too. Or order stuff online from abroad. Why bother using some local payment processor that barely works if you can just use your Visa card?

      Independent payment systems only work in countries that are poor (where people don’t travel or buy stuff from abroad) and/or isolated by sanctions or internal restrictions.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Europeans are rich and like to travel all over the world,

        Or just 100 km to cross the border and it’s already another country. Or if you live in a border town, it might be a short walk lol

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        the EU has the power to legislate that their version be offered in a non-discriminatory way anywhere cards with comparable fees are offered… similar to requirements to accept Euros etc

        i could for sure see that having a “globally” requirement tacked onto it, arguing that if it’s implemented in Europe and is comparable or better for fees then it’s discriminatory rather than economic to not offer it elsewhere

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            that’s what i mean about the globally requirement. there are plenty of companies that operate globally, so they could probably mandate that it’s accepted by these companies anywhere they do business

            probably couldn’t mandate it for companies that don’t operate in the EU, but if it makes good business sense then they wouldn’t need to. the original mandates IMO are just needed for critical mass

    • Kkk2237pl@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The same like with EVs :) ceos could cut off profits without worrying about innovation

      Btw in Poland we blik, as I remember 6 polish banks has equal shares and 1/7 has mastercard.

      At least there some profit stays in Eu…

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Please, make it available to Americans. I want to buy my hentai, and uphold the social contract with my fellow perverts.

  • Ontimp@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have high hopes for the Digital Euro.

    To have a digital payment medium that is issued by the central bank and can be exchanged without fees as a 1:1 digital equipment of cash would be amazing and go beyond just replacing American credit card providers.

  • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’ve had Twint for over a decade in Switzerland and it’s adopted everywhere here, I have no idea why every country is cooking their own new system right now.

    Pick one that works already and roll it out on the whole continent, it’s not that hard.

    • kutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Twint isn’t really an alternative. Swiss cards still use the visa/mastercard networks.

      • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Twint does not use Visa or Mastercard at all, it’s connected to your bank account and works with QR codes, NFC and Phone Numbers.

        • kutt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s what i’m saying, it’s just like Wero but slightly more advanced, a way to pay without using your card.

          • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Are you still using physical cards? I haven’t used a physical card in years since NFC has been commonplace.

            • kutt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Most of the time I use Apple Pay in person. However sometimes they don’t accept it online so I have to use my card.

              When I said “pay without using your card” I meant online, because I’ve never used Twint in a physical shop.

              • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Are yon never buying stuff at a local butcher shop, flower truck or at a farmers store (Hofladen)? Most of them only take cash or Twint here.

    • Pamasich@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Pick one that works already and roll it out on the whole continent, it’s not that hard.

      Twint is working on that, just in a more federation-style way than “pick one”.

      The European Mobile Payment Systems Association (EMPSA) aims for interoperability between its various members across Europe. So you can use your country’s app with the systems in other countries.

      Looking at the members list, there’s Switzerland, Italy, Germany, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Poland, Bulgaria, Greece, Portugal, Sweden, Romania, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Albania currently on the list.

      It seems the German/Austrian, Swiss, and Italian solutions have already been made interoperable based on their milestone showcase.

    • NorskSud@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Other countries also have their own systems since long… MBway in Portugal is also more than a decade old.

    • akmur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think every country has its own, Italy has the Bancomat network for example - but you can’t pay online with it. Then we have Satispay, which works like in China, with QR codes. Satispay is quite huge in Italy.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      In NZ we’ve had electronic card payments outside of the credit card system for about 40-something years.

      It just took a long time to catch up to online payments, but it’s slowly getting there.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because Switzerland is not in the EU and the ECB won’t let that happen. They’d rather have the yanks ripping them off than allow real competition.

      Protectionism sucks.

      • NorskSud@lemmy.ptOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s a ridiculous claim as several EU countries have their own systems, which they are trying to make interoperable between them in some cases or merge into Wero in others.

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, the single market for goods is well established. The same cannot be said for services.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m pretty sure it’s Switzerland that doesn’t want to join the EU and not the other way around

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Eh? I never said they did. They just have a very well built financial system. Unlike the EU.

    • dello_iv@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Isn’t Twint still going through Visa for the in-store purchase? I remember reading it somewhere, but can’t find the source for it unfortunately, but in general whenever it is an option I prefer that over other means of payment, the only strange thing is having a separate twint app for each bank lol

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not sure if it’s a bank specific, but on my UBS account TWINT is linked to the VISA credit card account (and I don’t see any option to change that). So every transaction goes through VISA.

        • dello_iv@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Mmmm on my UBS account I have it connected directly to the account itself, you can probably change that via More --> Settings --> Manage payment methods

      • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nope, Twint is connected directly to your Bank. Neither Visa, nor Mastercard nor anyone else is playing middleman. Every Swiss Bank has their own Twint App which directly connects to your account.

        When you pay at a store or person to person with Twint it’s a direct transaction.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Twint is indeed directly connect to my bank … specifically to the VISA credit card account.