Feel free to use this a megathread for the US/Israeli war on Iran.

  • Viceversa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Because Iran wasn’t a dictatorship.
    It had factions.

    Isn’t ayatollah the supreme leader?

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Isn’t the president the executive branch?

      Jesus Christ, do you have any critical thinking skills?

      • Viceversa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        As far as I know, ayatollah is entitled to command all leaders of all branches.
        That’s why he’s called the supreme leader.

        It’s not true?

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Stop ignoring everything else I wrote you fucking propaganda poisoned jackass.

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              No, you’re not.

              You’re arguing by title to ignore the points made like a sophist. That is explicitly rude, while trying to pretend it isn’t.

              Bad faith responses deserve nothing other than the reflection of the rudeness they project.

              • Viceversa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                I think we disagree.

                By the way, I’m from Russia, and we have our own “totally not authoritarian” head of just one branch of government.

                And the ayatollah - he’s effectively the head of all branches, while also having religious authority. It’s very hard to see any democracy here.

                • Count042@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  We don’t disagree. You are factually wrong. I’m not saying that it isn’t an authoritarian state. It absolutely is.but the simple fact of the matter is that the Ayatollah isn’t involved most decisions. His power mostly came into play with selecting who could run in their elections, which absolutely are real with the opposing sides running having significant political differences.

                  Did he get to set the goal posts for their parties? Yes, absolutely, and that isn’t a full on true democracy. But the Iranian civilians have far far more say in their government than a civilian Russian, for example.

                  Moreover, you’re debating all of this shit in ignorance to move the topic away from the fact the Iran didn’t have nukes SOLELY because the leader was religiously opposed to them. The religious leader the US and Israeli’s killed. While proving that they are unreliable negotiators.

                  The only rational view at this point for the average Iranian is to demand nukes.

                  • Viceversa@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 hour ago

                    You told me that Iran was covertly enriching uranuim , despite the will of ayatollah, because there are factions in Iran.

                    If that’s your point, then I disagree with you, because of all the power ayatollah had. I think he knew, if not ordered it.

                    (By the way, I’m not defending the USA & Israel war intervention. Nor am I enamoured with Iranian leadership.)