Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
inari@piefed.zip to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish ·
edit-2
4 days ago

40% of global ship traffic is simply moving fossil fuels around! Renewables make much of this traffic obsolete

slrpnk.net

message-square
189
fedilink
1.43K

40% of global ship traffic is simply moving fossil fuels around! Renewables make much of this traffic obsolete

slrpnk.net

inari@piefed.zip to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish ·
edit-2
4 days ago
message-square
189
fedilink
  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    4 days ago

    which means we need to transport less fuel around, so less ships

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      And more unemployed seamen’s.

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        4 days ago

        And more unemployed wharf whores.

        • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          4 days ago

          Doesn’t anyone think about wharf whores!

          • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 days ago

            Seaman certainly do.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m trying to pronounce the h’s here like Stewie Griffin.

            • modus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              Who whants a wharf whore with cool whip?

              • wewbull@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Sounds like a delectable combination.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        They can install solar panels or wire or something and not have to be away from their family for months at a time. Also the vast majority of seamen shipping oil are coerced captive workers from impoverished places with confiscated passports and no rights. Employed isn’t really the right word to use.

      • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        I prefer my semen unemployed, thank you.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        seamen’s

        What kind of abomination is this?

        • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I really don’t know.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          i found them in my little brother’s sock

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Employ them as the crew of an interplanetary solar sail expedition. We’ll be colonizing the moons of Jupiter in no time!

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Just put some money into advanced sailing ship tech and in a decade we’ll have advanced clippers with many more seamen needed.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        So overseas shipping rates drop and some of the companies convert their ships to give joy-rides in seas (because cheaper sea travel), while some seamen get to explore avenues like deep sea exploration (which seems to be a really underdeveloped field) and development.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Somehow I’m not seeing your average deck hand transitioning into deep sea exploration.

          • ulterno@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well, the average deck hand can stay working at the normal ships that are shipping other stuff.
            The above average ones can become a deck hand for the newer vehicles for deep sea operations.

            Both are probably already paid low enough that corporate can easily pay them while reducing shipping rates at the same time.

            • jaybone@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m thinking the deep sea exploration pays a bit more than a guy who can hook some cables on a crate.

              But wtf do I know…

              • ulterno@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                But of course, if the extra exploration rate can be afforded, then so can their salaries.
                The only thing that matters is whether there will be someone wanting to do so.

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 217 users / day
  • 2.14K users / week
  • 3.2K users / month
  • 6.97K users / 6 months
  • 43 local subscribers
  • 8.41K subscribers
  • 12.4K Posts
  • 46.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org