Thank you Microslop

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s shit like this that make me want to pursue a career in digging ditches with just a shovel, a bag of sandwiches, a thermos of coffee and the warm sunshine. Fuck the modern world. It jumped the rail a while ago now.

  • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It’s for the best.

    Learning how code works is better than getting an LLM to produce convincing looking code without anyone having an understanding of how it works.

    LLMs just teach students to paint themselves into a corner without them even realising why bad things keep happening to them.

    • PokerChips@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Right. It’s actually shocking that copilot is allowed at all. The next generation is going to be so fucking stupid.

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I agree, but I learn best when I can ask questions a certain way to understand concepts, and as much as people may hate it, it’s good at answering questions like that and people are often nasty when others ask questions they assume to be stupid.

      Not that I’m a student.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        people are often nasty when others ask questions they assume to be stupid.

        It sounds to me like you might want to reevaluate the communities you’re in. This sounds incredibly toxic.

        And I agree, for simple questions, it can be helpful. I would caution against overreliance on the answers though. Even the best models available today hallucinate regularly. Always verify answers when they are important.

        Also, learning to read documentation directly is a valuable skill to develop. Even if you don’t rely on the documentation directly, reading a lot of it will make it easier to write documentation as well.

  • TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Is this even a surprise? Giving away free access to Copilot hemorrhages money and only exists to convert those users into paying customers. It costs them nothing to take away some features from these users.

    The only real ways to prevent this are local hosting (which is much more realistic these days) or an explicit contract stating that the features you want will remain for the duration of the contract. The latter is not an option with GH Copilot, as far as I’m aware, and is basically nonexistent with any modern services.

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    So it begins. We are past the unlimited money stage and now the cuts begin to make AI somewhat profitable.

    Expect more of that in the coming months.

  • shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good example of why I don’t rely on technology I don’t control. I want my workflow to be future-proof and have a predictable cost.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, when anyone proposes building our tools on top of these services I ask “what will happen to this when they start charging what it really costs to run these models?”

    • joelthelion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      In general I agree with you, but llms are the one exception where it’s not practical and not cost effective to run them locally. If you want to use them, the better option is by far to pay someone for the service.