• Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And why don’t they just stop in Mexico? If they’re fleeing Honduras they’ve already achieved their goal.

      • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We can only take so many and crossing the border illegally should mean they are sent back. Do it right or go home. We have the right and the responsibility to protect our borders.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many exactly? Give me a number and explain why.

          And crossing the border and surrendering is legal. Which is what they do.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since when? They can do that at a legal border crossing they don’t need to risk their lives swimming across a river. If they’re crossing at a fence or at a river they’re not going to go with a legal route ever.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which part? The one that claims we don’t have infinite resources because that’s impossible? Or the claim that a sovereign nation has the right to defend its borders? Both of those things seem pretty fucking obvious to me.

            • Odusei@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Big difference between infinite resources and enough room for more of these refugees, no? One is a finite number after all.