Generally I’d be skeptical of any demographic research that has a separate result outcome for enbies since the amount of enbies is so small it’s difficult to make it representative.
Yeah, before digging into their data, I incorrectly assumed their sample size for this number was larger because of the percentage. I’m still not quite clear how they interpreted 3 for Mills and 0 for Platner as +96.7%, that seems more like +100%, but I’m not a statistician, so wtf do I know.
Generally I’d be skeptical of any demographic research that has a separate result outcome for enbies since the amount of enbies is so small it’s difficult to make it representative.
Yeah, before digging into their data, I incorrectly assumed their sample size for this number was larger because of the percentage. I’m still not quite clear how they interpreted 3 for Mills and 0 for Platner as +96.7%, that seems more like +100%, but I’m not a statistician, so wtf do I know.