• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Is this a coincidence or intentional? Pythagoras was a notable proto-vegan:

    As long as Man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings, he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other. Indeed, he who sows the seed of murder and pain cannot reap joy and love.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I always found this such a demented take, because like why are they so tilted by the idea of NOT eating meat? Do they truly believe that it’s ethically defensible, or are they actually relishing the idea of participating in increasing the net suffering in the world?

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      They have their ego invested in the idea. They can’t defend it logically, but everyone knows they are a good person, so their conclusion is it’s stupid because if it’s not stupid then they are less than a good person…

  • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    (1x2)+0=2

    If he is eating twice as much meat than before then the total meat consumption has doubled.

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      So, they’ll prolly die of congestive heart failure 20 years earlier, meaning… 80 years of meat consumption minus 20 years of life = 120 years of lifetime consumption at a 2x meat consumption rate… If both you and they’d eaten an omnivore diet and lived to 80 that’d be 160 years of cumulative consumption so we’re still ahead.

      I hope their principals make up for their significantly reduced quality of life