Once the law comes into effect, anyone found to posses or publish pornography which shows incest between family members, or sex between step- or foster-relations where one person is pretending to be under-18, will be criminalized
I suspect it’s so they can prosecute abusers who film unequivocally bad things, since this removes any room for interpretation or coaching the victims so the abuser can get off on a technicality.
That’s my best guess as to why it would be written like that. We might be getting primed by the headline to interpret it uncharitably.
CSA mention
Buried the lede on that pretty damn hard
Well that’s a lot more specific than the headline and also like… really hard to prove. That and why would it just be in one context it’s not allowed?
I suspect it’s so they can prosecute abusers who film unequivocally bad things, since this removes any room for interpretation or coaching the victims so the abuser can get off on a technicality.
That’s my best guess as to why it would be written like that. We might be getting primed by the headline to interpret it uncharitably.