• kattenluik@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally thought they were implying that China could be a privacy concern, as you don’t have a single clue what happens with your data there. There’s zero reason to assume anything bad especially with a simple statement like that.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I personally thought they were implying that China could be a privacy concern

      …and this is a good thing?

      • kattenluik@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you leave out the rest of what I said sure? I don’t actually know what you’re asking.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I left it out because its not important. You said they didn’t say anything bad and then said you thought they were saying it compromises your privacy. Maybe you don’t care about privacy but I think most people would consider invading your privacy very much “a bad thing”.

          • kattenluik@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This argument was never about invading privacy not being a bad thing? It was about the racism and such comment the other commenter made?

            • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My dude, do you have amnesia?

              I’d like to point out that they said nothing about it being a bad thing and that all they did was say it was Chinese-owned, hence making your comment a pointless attack of nonsense.

              They were very clearly implying that being Chinese-owned is a bad thing (because of the privacy implications), which is the opposite of what you said.

              • kattenluik@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m going to stop replying now because this is going nowhere, but no that is not what I said and I really don’t know what to tell you. You’re missing key things here about the intention and tone of my comment and the one I replied to.

                • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe you’d like to attempt again to explain what you meant? Because you have already confirmed my understanding was correct.