• Hoimo@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    feddit.uk

    Yeah, I can see that.

    But seriously, how much “incest” does the average family tree really have? And I’m drawing the line at great-grandparents, anything less than that is unrelated imo.

    Royals were doing multiple generations of first-degree incest, that’s on a completely different level from normal people.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      There’s probably lots of first and second cousins who married in centuries past, though even most royals usually didn’t do as much inbreeding as the extreme examples like the ancient Egyptians and Habsburgs. It became pretty common to look for spouses all over the continent, that’s why so many of the european royal families are related in various ways; arguably that means that they were probably less inbred than the average villager in most cases.

      • Hoimo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Like I said, royals aren’t normal people. See the fabled family tree of the Ptolemaic dynasty:

        But that only works if you have a family fortune to protect. Normal people would rather spread their children around and increase their chances of survival.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Holy shit!

          So for example: Cleopatra II was first married to Ptolemy VI, her brother, and had a daughter Cleopatra III. Then when Ptolemy VI died Cleopatra II was married to Ptolemy VIII, her other brother. Ptolemy VIII also took his niece Cleopatra III as his second wife.