You have to love how they shit talk wikipedia from which you can actually follow references to your heart’s content but are completely ok with the original post which doesn’t have a single reference lol. Ofcourse the main difference is not credibility but whether or not what is being written agrees with their world view.
You have to love how they shit talk wikipedia from which you can actually follow references to your heart’s content but are completely ok with the original post which doesn’t have a single reference lol. Ofcourse the main difference is not credibility but whether or not what is being written agrees with their world view.
“My sources didn’t meet standards for factual reporting and removed, they’re the problem and not my links! Not my fault my truth isn’t reality!”
Donating $5 for each downvote <3
Suit yourself, but they don’t need your money because the oligarchy has already covered their costs.
Their editors don’t either, bc you can go into the edit page and find a bunch of disclosures of sponsored edits