• SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    These are interesting thoughts, but we should be super-pooper careful when trying to apply random evopsych speculation to real world modern humans. ‘testosterone messes with stress therefore sudden stochastic violence seems more likely to be male’ is a wild claim based our very poor understanding of a very complex thing.

    It’s that kind of reasoning that backed a millenia of consensus that women are scientifically proven to be stupider, then it turned out it was all socialisation.

    • Formerlyfarman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thanks, of course socialization is the most important factor.

      while I admit I find Kipling’s arguments plausible, and I do at some level believe that, at the end of the day he is a victorian poet, and not a rigorous scientist. The rhymes play a part at making such an argument more convincing.

      I apologize for the comments of testosterone. You are of course right that it is more complex than that. And now that I think of it, it was disrespectful of me to assume other people’s experience. It occurs to me that we have several people here who have been both a man and a woman, now I am curious as to wether they feel a difference in their reactions, but I’m not sure it’s appropriate to ask.