There’s discussion, then there’s just repeatedly showing up to things you don’t like just to tell people how much you don’t like them. Technically still “just an opinion” but honestly no one wants to hear it after the second time.
What’s the goal there? Win Best Hater award? Have everyone pander to you and stop posting? Bah, away with that nonsense.
Ah, okay, see that’s my bad, I thought comments were places for discussion, not places to whine and cry every time you see a specific artist , that’s on me.
Opinions (even negative ones) are a form of discussion.
I get the sense that you are speaking out about circumstances relating to this specific artist (maybe they’ve been excessively hounded by a brigade of haters), but your original comment, esp. the last line was quite general, and is largely what I was responding to.
I mean, do you feel that it radically changes the sentence?
While it specifies that especially the last line was general (which I agree), the sentence is still saying that Courtney’s entire comment was quite general while the very first sentence of her comment specifies it’s about this particular comic.
The entire comment cannot be general when it contextualized its subject right from the first sentence.
I don’t have any stance on this comic or this artist (never seen them before), but comment sections are kind of exactly for opinions to be shared.
There’s discussion, then there’s just repeatedly showing up to things you don’t like just to tell people how much you don’t like them. Technically still “just an opinion” but honestly no one wants to hear it after the second time.
What’s the goal there? Win Best Hater award? Have everyone pander to you and stop posting? Bah, away with that nonsense.
I agree, although this particular bit
works both ways - so much so that I initially misinterpreted your comment when I quickly scanned it before properly re-reading
Ah, okay, see that’s my bad, I thought comments were places for discussion, not places to whine and cry every time you see a specific artist , that’s on me.
Carry on whiners!
Opinions (even negative ones) are a form of discussion.
I get the sense that you are speaking out about circumstances relating to this specific artist (maybe they’ve been excessively hounded by a brigade of haters), but your original comment, esp. the last line was quite general, and is largely what I was responding to.
Nice work on the truncation.
I mean, do you feel that it radically changes the sentence?
While it specifies that especially the last line was general (which I agree), the sentence is still saying that Courtney’s entire comment was quite general while the very first sentence of her comment specifies it’s about this particular comic.
The entire comment cannot be general when it contextualized its subject right from the first sentence.
deleted by creator