• BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Point is every society has significant number of egoistic actors. You can’t design a socio-economical system with assumption that everyone will just work for “common good”

      • magnus (he/him)@venner.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        @BlackLaZoR the difference is that in a hierarchical system (like capitalism, where capital concetrates), those egoistic people tend to be at the top of society.

        Capitalism is a horrible bad solution to dealing with egoistic people

        • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          First, Egoist =/= Evil and Altruist =/= Good

          Worst criminals of history often justified their crimes with “higher need” or some other noble goal.

          Second, it’s the best solution that has been proven to work. And it’s the best solution because it aligns incentives.

            • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              the world is facing extinction level global warming

              Not really. You can already see the shift from fossil to renewables because they’re cheaper. 40% of electricity globally comes from renewables + nuclear already, and renewable power covers all new demand every year.

              https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix

              It’s not that capitalism cares about environment it just happens that fossil is getting progressively harder to mine while renewables (especially solar) are getting cheaper due to economics of scale.