you have no clue about the real actions of anyone online, i fucking hate when people spout this take off. i actually post way less now that im not organizing, i dont even call myself a communist anymore due to my utter lack of action but this shit of accusing people who are posting criticisms you disagree with as larpers has got to stop
according to some posts, mr. piker gets 30k viewers, the most out of “left” “influencers”, do you think the rather curious absence of any green or psl candidates on his stream is unintentional?
if the message is we should support those who might win, why not support hakeem jeffries (as endorsed by aocia and obamdani)?
building something requires logarithmic effort (as in - getting from 1 to 10 is as hard as from 10 to 100), do you think 3rd party will benefit from mr. piker attention or lose? do you think mr. piker will win or lose from supporting 3rd party?
i’ll say i am surprised and disappointed he hasn’t had PSL reps on his stream if that’s the case; and would agree that he could/should use sprinkle some clout in races for socialist party candidates as strategically appropriate.
but the implications of the OG post is that hasan is intentionally designing right-wing coded candidates – that seems plainly untrue, given his prominent support of other non-good ol’ boy oyster farmers (zohran ran, what a 6 hour marathon, and couldn’t bench 100 lbs? dude is a waif). further, this contention it is incoherent with the larger thrust that hasan is failing to take a leadership role: is the issue that he’s a bad leader, or not a leader at all?
if the message is . . . .
the message is, and should be, we want to win, by any means necessary. winning doesn’t mean Go Blue; it means ending genocide, it means everyone gets healthcare, elder care and an education, can have meaningful work, and a home. and if the organic intellectuals in Maine want some meathead advocating for that, so be it. and any means means any means. and if the people are still only ready for the ballot box, so be it. more vanguardist energy should be spent preparing for after the ballot box, and not the endless moral posturing, the endless kvetching online about a streamer.
![Finally, a second cointelpoints [cw:hasan]](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/79a52618-3c2c-40cb-b40d-843dbe22b1ce.png){kind=link}
a bunch of righteous, pure, direct actors are not actually acting, and it’s this himbos fault, lol.
you have no clue about the real actions of anyone online, i fucking hate when people spout this take off. i actually post way less now that im not organizing, i dont even call myself a communist anymore due to my utter lack of action but this shit of accusing people who are posting criticisms you disagree with as larpers has got to stop
It’s a three day old account. They are gonna troll.
according to some posts, mr. piker gets 30k viewers, the most out of “left” “influencers”, do you think the rather curious absence of any green or psl candidates on his stream is unintentional?
if the message is we should support those who might win, why not support hakeem jeffries (as endorsed by aocia and obamdani)?
building something requires logarithmic effort (as in - getting from 1 to 10 is as hard as from 10 to 100), do you think 3rd party will benefit from mr. piker attention or lose? do you think mr. piker will win or lose from supporting 3rd party?
i’ll say i am surprised and disappointed he hasn’t had PSL reps on his stream if that’s the case; and would agree that he could/should use sprinkle some clout in races for socialist party candidates as strategically appropriate.
but the implications of the OG post is that hasan is intentionally designing right-wing coded candidates – that seems plainly untrue, given his prominent support of other non-good ol’ boy oyster farmers (zohran ran, what a 6 hour marathon, and couldn’t bench 100 lbs? dude is a waif). further, this contention it is incoherent with the larger thrust that hasan is failing to take a leadership role: is the issue that he’s a bad leader, or not a leader at all?
the message is, and should be, we want to win, by any means necessary. winning doesn’t mean Go Blue; it means ending genocide, it means everyone gets healthcare, elder care and an education, can have meaningful work, and a home. and if the organic intellectuals in Maine want some meathead advocating for that, so be it. and any means means any means. and if the people are still only ready for the ballot box, so be it. more vanguardist energy should be spent preparing for after the ballot box, and not the endless moral posturing, the endless kvetching online about a streamer.
Well that has an easy answer, for me at least- ive never heard the guy say even a single word that was not 1000% incontrovertible Loser Shit