• A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Very interesting. So they both manouvred (slingshot) using planets’ gravity wells? Not everything in SciFi is fiction I guess.

    And V1 has traveled further from our solar system than the solar system’s diameter. Wow.

    Extremely high bitrate on the video due to starry background, btw. My old lappy got wheezy.

    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      In the scientific fiction genre, everything is scientifically possible. That’s the entire premise. Time tells us what they get right and what becomes fantasy.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It’s absolutely fantasy. No debate. So is Star Trek.

            Actual science fiction is like the recent Hail Mary. Everything is based on literal real science, with maybe one “what if” kind of stretch.

            • RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I don’t know that i’d go that far. There is certainly debate on what constutes hard or soft sci-fi, but I’d say as long as the technology is either the focus, or is the main facilitator of the story then it’s more sci-fi. In star wars there is not much technology that is necessarily required, all of it could have been replaced with fantasy elements and it’s the same. It’s not a focus, whereas the expanse for instance relies upon the limitations of the technology to drive the plot.

              I don’t know could be talking out my ass, purely vibes based genre definition.