• racoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why? Browsers and software can become ever more complex and hog more resources like RAM, which are basically free

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I just wish the mobile app had an ability to display more than two bookmarks at a time without the need to scroll and click through menus to get to them. Desktop app has a bookmarks toolbar, the mobile equivalent sucks.

  • Poutine [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Every time I see a blog post with a title like this from Mozilla, I have a conversation like this in my head:

    Me: You’re changing the tab shape again, aren’t you?

    Mozilla: Today, we’re announcing a new— erm, yes, we’re changing the tab shape…

    Me: Anything else?

    Mozilla: We’re centering privacy settings in—

    Me: So nothing new?

    Mozilla: Not really…

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    19 hours ago

    eh it looks cool and all, but why do we need a redesign every 6 months?

    shouldn’t they be using those man-hours to like, solve the fingerprinting problem for example?

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      https://arkenfox.github.io/thorin/items/02browserfingerprinting.html

      you can’t “solve” fingerprinting. spoofing makes you more unique. and you cannot spoof everything. looking normal helps more than trying to hide. the only real solution to it would be creating a standard to all browsers, which is what tor does, and it’s why it works. same settings, same window size, same engine, etc. if you want fingerprinting resistance, use tor!

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 hours ago

        the only real solution to it would be creating a standard to all browsers, which is what tor does

        there you go. do that to firefox.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          this would imply not being able to resize your window for example… you cant do that to a general purpose software. you need to useba tool that fits your needs. it would be the equivalent of complaining about Debian not being an amnesiac distro. Tails exists for this…

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            this would imply not being able to resize your window for example

            Or it would let you resize and report the same size as everyone else.

              • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 hours ago

                What do you mean? If all Firefox users report the same size, than you are one of many. That’s the point. It makes you stand out less. Off course this works only if you are not the only one that sticks out and its the default.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            since you mention it, firefox has a feature where it launches with a generic predetermined window size so you blend in. even then screen resolution can only get them so far.

            i’m not calling for firefox to be tor, just that everyday software must be more private too.

            • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              yes, tor uses that feature to make all users look the same, if you resize a bit your tor window that’s it. you can be identified. for fingerprinting to work every browser would need to look the same. this means no extensions, no difference in window size, same settings, etc. do you think that’s actually feasible for an everyday browser? really?

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                i know. but each point you touched can be improved upon. my point is that browsers are too transparent to third parties, and that’s one of the priorities.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        i’d trust mozilla to pay for developers instead of yearly redesigns.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I hate everything about “modern design” … Rounded corners, gradients, blur and transparency effects, fading in/out … fuck that! I want my browser to look and feel like the rest of my UI.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is basically what I was thinking. I customized Firefox to be less rounded with sharp edges, single color and much denser. I don’t know why every application is treated like a new abstract art (off course I’m exaggerating here).

    • Gnergy@piefed.europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      oddly enough all these things have repeatedly appeared, disappeared, and reappeared in my lifetime, e.g. titlebars on Windows became transparent with Vista, then stopped being so in, I think, Windows 8?

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I like some of these things, but I’d be ok with them being optional toggles. I remember seeing a Firefox fork with extensive customization options for the UI

      Personally

      • rounded corners make it easier to see what is contained in what. It gives more information than just having everything meet at corners
      • gradients and blurs match the rest of my UI 😄
  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They chance the look again. I have to say, the new look looks better than the current default. But it’s not for me and I will heavily customize the look anyway. Hopefully my current customization works as it is and I have nothing to do…