• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Didn’t think they could make the tabs any less clear and contrasted than they did last time, so I guess they sure showed me.

    • racoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Why? Browsers and software can become ever more complex and hog more resources like RAM, which are basically free

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    eh it looks cool and all, but why do we need a redesign every 6 months?

    shouldn’t they be using those man-hours to like, solve the fingerprinting problem for example?

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      https://arkenfox.github.io/thorin/items/02browserfingerprinting.html

      you can’t “solve” fingerprinting. spoofing makes you more unique. and you cannot spoof everything. looking normal helps more than trying to hide. the only real solution to it would be creating a standard to all browsers, which is what tor does, and it’s why it works. same settings, same window size, same engine, etc. if you want fingerprinting resistance, use tor!

      • Programman4233@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        how does spoofing make you more unique? If I change my browser resolution to a more common resolution that would make me less recognizable, for example.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          You can lie to the website and say your resolution is 1024x768. But what happens when the JavaScript fingerprinting checks the actual width of the view port? Your view port is most likely larger than your stated screen size.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          because when you spoof whatever is fingerprinting you sees that you’re actually providing fake data, so now you enter the list of the “hidden” instead of blending in. this is the core philosophy of tor browser, and a known fact. if you read partially the article i linked it talks about this.

      • foxfell@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think he meant amount of human hours spent on total bs like redesign and real engine improvements, nithing more.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        the only real solution to it would be creating a standard to all browsers, which is what tor does

        there you go. do that to firefox.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          this would imply not being able to resize your window for example… you cant do that to a general purpose software. you need to useba tool that fits your needs. it would be the equivalent of complaining about Debian not being an amnesiac distro. Tails exists for this…

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            24 hours ago

            this would imply not being able to resize your window for example

            Or it would let you resize and report the same size as everyone else.

              • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                17 hours ago

                What do you mean? If all Firefox users report the same size, than you are one of many. That’s the point. It makes you stand out less. Off course this works only if you are not the only one that sticks out and its the default.

                • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  this is one thing, do you understand how limiting it would make the browser? its not just window size, this is one example. and afaik if you spoof your window size you can break rendering of pages. again, you’re comprimising everyday usage. im not saying there isn’t a way at all, maybe there is, but it’s not some trivial thing, ive followed arkenfox for quite a few years and they’ve been saying the same. the amount of time it takes to make a redesign is nothing to making an unfingerprintable browser. if that’s even a thing. and remember that you cant spoof everything.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            since you mention it, firefox has a feature where it launches with a generic predetermined window size so you blend in. even then screen resolution can only get them so far.

            i’m not calling for firefox to be tor, just that everyday software must be more private too.

            • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              yes, tor uses that feature to make all users look the same, if you resize a bit your tor window that’s it. you can be identified. for fingerprinting to work every browser would need to look the same. this means no extensions, no difference in window size, same settings, etc. do you think that’s actually feasible for an everyday browser? really?

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                i know. but each point you touched can be improved upon. my point is that browsers are too transparent to third parties, and that should be one of the priorities.

  • Poutine [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every time I see a blog post with a title like this from Mozilla, I have a conversation like this in my head:

    Me: You’re changing the tab shape again, aren’t you?

    Mozilla: Today, we’re announcing a new— erm, yes, we’re changing the tab shape…

    Me: Anything else?

    Mozilla: We’re centering privacy settings in—

    Me: So nothing new?

    Mozilla: Not really…

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I just wish the mobile app had an ability to display more than two bookmarks at a time without the need to scroll and click through menus to get to them. Desktop app has a bookmarks toolbar, the mobile equivalent sucks.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hate everything about “modern design” … Rounded corners, gradients, blur and transparency effects, fading in/out … fuck that! I want my browser to look and feel like the rest of my UI.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      This is basically what I was thinking. I customized Firefox to be less rounded with sharp edges, single color and much denser. I don’t know why every application is treated like a new abstract art (off course I’m exaggerating here).

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s mine (resized to not have a huge screenshot file)

        Custom fully custom labwc theme, customized GTK theme, modified Firefox (userChrome.css)

        Thunar for reference.

        Anything more and I’d feel super distracted and annoyed.

        • Kynsey@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I go even further on the minimal UI personally lol. Black box over the date/time is an edit and the theme I have is animated so it has rain partiles falling down. But I like as much of my screen as possible to be the content and want the browser out of the way. I’m hoping they don’t entirely break my current setup. It’s technically Floorp but that’s Firefox based so we’ll see.

          Edit: Figured I should clarify. When I say minimal I mean like how MUCH of the UI I have. Like tabs and search bar in the same row. I don’t mean like minimalism. I’m clearly more maximalist in my themeing than you lol.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I was hoping for screenshot sharing, lol. Yours look similar familiar, I wouldn’t be surprised if we shared in the past whenever we had this topic before.

          Mine evolves from time to time. Sometimes I learn something new from new screenshots and incorporate that. One such recent “implementation” is the Bookmarks Toolbar. I created a top level directory named “Favorites” and put all quick access bookmarks in there and moved the toolbar to the same level of tabs, to save me an entire extra line of bar. My current Firefox looks like this:

          I’m on KDE, the titlebar is disabled for all windows (I’m an auto tiler person). BTW I’m not sure how to get rid off the rounded corners of the window, but that is not Firefox specific.

    • Gnergy@piefed.europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      oddly enough all these things have repeatedly appeared, disappeared, and reappeared in my lifetime, e.g. titlebars on Windows became transparent with Vista, then stopped being so in, I think, Windows 8?

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes, it’s fortunately just a trend. Just like websites. At one point tiny 10px font for main text content and absurdly small navigation buttons were seen as “modern”, nowadays huge empty spaces and 30px fonts are the norm.

        Or Javascript vs no Javascript, this also changes every few years.

        I just hope this ugly mess will just be the annoying design fad of the year.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like some of these things, but I’d be ok with them being optional toggles. I remember seeing a Firefox fork with extensive customization options for the UI

      Personally

      • rounded corners make it easier to see what is contained in what. It gives more information than just having everything meet at corners
      • gradients and blurs match the rest of my UI 😄
  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    They chance the look again. I have to say, the new look looks better than the current default. But it’s not for me and I will heavily customize the look anyway. Hopefully my current customization works as it is and I have nothing to do…