• finnadrag@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    total emissions = emissions per capita * capita

    Unless we figure out carbon neutrality without cratering HDI in the next year or two maybe lets work on reducing birth rates. ‘we could have 20 billion people if we all live like subsistence farmers’ is fucking stupid.

    • brownsugga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      except that not all “capita” have same emissions. someone in Eritrea has a much smaller “carbon footprint” (a term invented by BP to distract from their own wanton disregard for the environment) than a billionaire in the western world

      • finnadrag@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yes that means it’s less important to reduce birth rate in Eritrea than in the US or Australia or whatever. As long as you’re either not concerned about raising their HDI rapidly or you think it can raise without per capita emissions rising with it and good luck with that.

      • finnadrag@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        It doesn’t need to be, the core concept is simple. We are already overpopulated because we are failing to sustainably provide for 8 billion people. Doubling the number of people to provide for is not going to help.