• gabelstapler@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    The heading is a bit confusing. The committee voted in favour of the agreement: zero tariffs for imports of US products into the EU and 15% tariffs for importing EU goods into the US. In addition to opening the EU market to US agricultural products.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 days ago

      That is an objectively bad ““agreement””. It makes us more dependent. Why shouldn’t we do the reverse?

      • Vincent@feddit.nl
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Europe has a weak negotiation position because it’s not willing to hurt itself.

          • Vincent@feddit.nl
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I mean, the choice is basically between 15% tarrifs in the US and 0% in the EU, or more in both. Both hurt the EU, but the latter hurts the EU more - it just also hurts the US more.

    • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      That’s increadibly stupid. 15% import tarrifs from EU to the US, sure, but right back at 'em. 15% into EU. Anything else is capitulation.

    • ironblossom@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      They didn’t agree to zero tariffs on US imports, many US goods have been tariffed for decades. It scraps tariffs for specific US goods. It also doesn’t agree to a blanket 15% tariff rate but rather caps US tariffs to 15%