Well, the thing about a treaty is that both sides agreed to it. We can have a discussion about how they were negotiated or were written, but both sides signed. These treaties absolutely give Canada legitimate rule over First Nations. That’s why they were signed. It gives FN certain freedoms and Canada certain responsibilities. Again, we can discuss if those have been honoured to the letter, but the Canadian courts regularly uphold those treaties. I suggest you take your moral outrage to a library and find some facts.
Why would that be a concern of the EU? That’s an inner political topic of Canada.The EU doesnt have a say in that, and it shouldn’t.
Canada has no legitimate rule over nor ownership of First Nation people. It is not Canada’s place to say “mind your own business”.
Well, the thing about a treaty is that both sides agreed to it. We can have a discussion about how they were negotiated or were written, but both sides signed. These treaties absolutely give Canada legitimate rule over First Nations. That’s why they were signed. It gives FN certain freedoms and Canada certain responsibilities. Again, we can discuss if those have been honoured to the letter, but the Canadian courts regularly uphold those treaties. I suggest you take your moral outrage to a library and find some facts.