EatingOnions@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 天前‘We don’t want to be cannon fodder’: Lukashenko rules out sending troops to Ukrainetvpworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1134 cross-posted to: ukrainianconflict@lemmit.online
arrow-up1134external-link‘We don’t want to be cannon fodder’: Lukashenko rules out sending troops to Ukrainetvpworld.comEatingOnions@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 天前message-square16fedilink cross-posted to: ukrainianconflict@lemmit.online
minus-squaretestaccount372920@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 天前Belarus has said since the start of the war that they won’t send troops, so nothing new. It also makes sense, since they’re both a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and they’re awfully much in strike range of Ukrainian aerial attacks.
minus-squareCalavera@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前How can they be a buffer zone if Russia can use them as base for attacks anytime they want?
minus-squaretestaccount372920@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 天前Buffer zone for Russia, not for NATO
minus-squareCalavera@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 天前So they sending troops to support Russia don’t change the status quo
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 天前Yes but Luka is owned completely and totally by Pooty-poot, so he wouldn’t announce that if it hadn’t been vetted, right?
How’d he get permission for that?
Belarus has said since the start of the war that they won’t send troops, so nothing new. It also makes sense, since they’re both a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and they’re awfully much in strike range of Ukrainian aerial attacks.
How can they be a buffer zone if Russia can use them as base for attacks anytime they want?
Buffer zone for Russia, not for NATO
So they sending troops to support Russia don’t change the status quo
Yes but Luka is owned completely and totally by Pooty-poot, so he wouldn’t announce that if it hadn’t been vetted, right?