,you could literally apply this nonsense to every single law we have, so yeah your entire argument is just backwards and retarded.
So you could take any law, remove one word, and make it acceptable? Because that was my “retarded” argument.
This is something that has happened countless times, there are so many examples that it would be next to impossible to list them all. It’s honestly shocking that this still needs to be explained to people.
I can use this stupid logic against any law. Let’s remove rape law because someone women will abuse it to get insurance claims or put men to prison, let me bully and assault people on the streets because i should be able to have freedom of speach and expression, let me walk naked on the streets if I want to express myself this way why I can’t? If you still don’t understand this retarded reasoning then someone else have to explain it to you
Rape laws exist to prevent (and punish) a horrible act.
If a specific rape law included a clause saying, “if she gets pregnant, it doesn’t count,” then that would be a problem wouldn’t it?
Despite the original intention of the law, it would be used to harm people.
So we should seek to improve the wording of that law so it cannot be abused.
There are people who purposely word things in ways that allow them to take advantage. For example, again, the inclusion of “degrading” in this law.
I’m curious what good you think would come of including that word and how it compares to the likely abuse of it?
You are literally trying to stop people from criticizing the wording of laws because, what, some shitty slippery slope argument that doesn’t even logically follow?
Oh no, if we care about the wording of this law, we’re gonna start caring about her wording of every law! We can’t have that!
So you could take any law, remove one word, and make it acceptable? Because that was my “retarded” argument.
This is something that has happened countless times, there are so many examples that it would be next to impossible to list them all. It’s honestly shocking that this still needs to be explained to people.
Read a fucking book.
I can use this stupid logic against any law. Let’s remove rape law because someone women will abuse it to get insurance claims or put men to prison, let me bully and assault people on the streets because i should be able to have freedom of speach and expression, let me walk naked on the streets if I want to express myself this way why I can’t? If you still don’t understand this retarded reasoning then someone else have to explain it to you
Yeah you’ve completely missed the fucking point.
Rape laws exist to prevent (and punish) a horrible act.
If a specific rape law included a clause saying, “if she gets pregnant, it doesn’t count,” then that would be a problem wouldn’t it?
Despite the original intention of the law, it would be used to harm people.
So we should seek to improve the wording of that law so it cannot be abused.
There are people who purposely word things in ways that allow them to take advantage. For example, again, the inclusion of “degrading” in this law.
I’m curious what good you think would come of including that word and how it compares to the likely abuse of it?
You are literally trying to stop people from criticizing the wording of laws because, what, some shitty slippery slope argument that doesn’t even logically follow?
Oh no, if we care about the wording of this law, we’re gonna start caring about her wording of every law! We can’t have that!