Sad to see. We should all know cloudlfare decrypts our data before it reaches the service it protects. A perfect surveillance man-in-the-middle.

I was happy to find a home in the fediverse that uses Anubis instead.

https://anubis.techaro.lol/

    • TerdFerguson@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yeah, I accept your apology. Anubis self-hosted and open source. I suppose you COULD use it between Cloudflare and your service, but why WOULD you?

      • Artwork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) protection…
        With 500 Tbps of network capacity, Cloudflare has mitigated some of the largest DDoS attacks ever recorded, without slowing down performance for customers.

        Website DDoS protection is Free in all application services plans…

        Source: https://www.cloudflare.com/en-in/ddos/

        • misery mansion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s not OPs point at all, whether or not Cloudflare is good or best at DDoS protection.

          This is like arguing that everyone should only shop on Amazon because they’re cheapest and fastest.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 days ago

            OP asked “why WOULD someone” use it, not why should. I think their question was answered appropriately.

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              It was only answered appropriately if you ignore the context of the conversation which was a person comparing the two services by showing that they were both reverse proxies while discussing the privacy implications of Cloudflare’s reverse proxy being proprietary and privately hosted.

              The person they were replying to was suggesting that there is no difference between Cloudflare and Anubis because they’re both reverse proxies. The fact that Cloudflare owns a bunch of infrastructure to mitigate DDoSs is irrelevant.

              • TerdFerguson@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Oh, you definitely got why I’m against Cloudflare…

                Cloudflare has bot-mitigation built in, sure. So why would someone Anubis between their app and Cloudflare as it fulfills it’s reverese proxy role, idk. It seemed like that person was trying to explain to me where Anubis was supposed to fit in sequence here. It’s meant for the reverse proxy scenarios specificed in the example (nginx, Caddy, and others)

                You are also correct. The “free” DDoS mitigation is an irrelevant argument against the privacy implications of using Cloudflare. Cloudflare isn’t the only DDoS mitigation option.

                *BuT iT’s FrEe! *

                Is it, really?

      • plutopos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I accept your apology

        Please log out of the internet and don’t come back until you touch some grass and/or get laid

        • Ghoelian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Why? They made an entirely irrelevant comment.

          That they’re proxies is not the issue, it’s that with one you have to trust some company with all your traffic, while with the other you can use your own infrastructure.

          We’re in the privacy community here, suggesting cloudflare is just rediculous.