Pepperidge Farms must’ve met my dad a few years back.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 小时前

    So natural gas powerplants with sufficient exhaust scrubbers are having a substantial effect on atmospheric pollutants? I feel like we keep getting off of the main question here. Like to stoves and lighters and such. I get nothing burns perfectly clean but seems like just an engineering hurtle to me. With natural gas I’m typically more concerned about the hydro fracking aspect. There’s really not a solution to groundwater contamination in fracking beyond them saying it didn’t happen.

    • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 小时前

      Scrubbers cannot possibly capture all of it. It’s not just an engineering hurdle. It’s physics. Just like burning it can never be 100% efficient, scrubbing it cannot either.

      Even if it were possible to somehow scrub 100% of the CO2 and other methane byproducts, it would be unbelievably expensive. Not only is it something that frankly shouldn’t even be focused on any more when we already have cheap, green, renewable energy, but do you expect the capitalist billionaires to care enough to pay for the new scrubbers (which, by the way, in this context, do not even exist?)

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 小时前

      Yeah. Of course, the phrase “sufficient exhaust scrubbers” is about as reasonable as “100% perfect combustion” in this context. Engineering or no.