Chat Control is not dead. The EU (still) wants to scan your private messages and photos

The “Chat Control” proposal would legalise scanning of all private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos. This threatens fundamental privacy rights and digital security for all EU citizens.

  • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I’m completely pro chat control. To make it more accepted, we just need to show that it’s a good idea and lead by example! That’s why I propose, to completely publish all communications of our politicians and those that they communicate with. This content trove will be reviewed with AI* to make sure that there are no bad guys hiding in the government, right? As always, if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear!

    * AI - Audience Interest: every one of us is free to analyze everything and publish and discuss their findings publicly.

    /s?

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What was the method again to ensure that undead vampires do not leave their grave after their burial? Seems a little ritual needs to be added to the proceedings…

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        43 minutes ago

        Gorram, seemed nearby. There needs to be protection against lobbyists (could stop here) pushing the same crap that got shot down already, again and again. Throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks is for bluesky development, not governance.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      For a few, true freedom requires the enslavement of many.

      The liberal democratic experiments are dying at the hands of their own owners. Turns out History didn’t end.

  • alakey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I really wish there was some sort of rule that stated that if your proposal failed it gets blacklisted for the next 10 years, regardless of the framing of the proposal.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The Epstein class, that is causing the world to collapse, is also behind chat control and age verification.

      They’re gunning for totalitarian dictatorship.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This kinda shit makes me glad we left. Then I look at our own government, it’s just as bad!

    • Noja@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Sorry but the UK is still like 10x worse even if Chat Control would pass.

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, the UK adopted 1984 as an instruction manual ages ago. I last visited it almost 20 years ago, but even then, the level of public surveillance alone was already ridiculous.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They will make it illegal, or they will force mandatory backdoors into it. It will be hacked within days, and they will blame “left wing extremism.”

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The easiest would be to let the OS grab the keys of every connection and transmit them to the government.

      For everybody with their own OS, they can use the backdoors on the chips to get the keys.

    • mimavox@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Probably mandatory scanning on device before encryption. Will destroy all privacy focused apps.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        In this case, privacy-focused apps would just not implement it, as it’s the voluntary chat control “1.0” which we already had before. Of course, it would probably be used to eventually have another go at the mandatory scanning again.