• Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    First half of the headline implies legitimate criticism. But considering Sweeney’s history, I think it would be easy to expect it to be an agenda of attacking Valve however he can.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s the Streisand effect. Microsoft felt it too: “Don’t call it slop” the web now calls it “Microslop”. Tim doesn’t want the disclosure to be seen, so what does the web do? Off course they develop a plugin to make the disclosure even bigger. This is how things are done in real world. Tim is a baby and does not know how reality works. :-)

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    24 hours ago

    There would be absolutely zero pushback if Steam mandated a disclosure of what game engine the game used or what modelling program the models were made with.

    But suddenly it’s a huge deal when they have to disclose if they’ve used a fraud-funded plagiarism machine. Hmm, wonder why.

    • Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’d probably push back on requiring model disclosure. Tons of games use purchased assets, and a full accounting of all the relevant software in that chain seems challenging. Additionally, any user-generated content is going to be very difficult to audit for similar reasons.

      Meanwhile, it seems like this would make for a relatively easy way for spiteful individuals to attack developers for “failure to accurately disclose” sorts of things.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    23 hours ago

    cant believe the guy who is placing a big emphasis on the AI integration features in Unreal Engine 6 would be upset about devs needing to disclose if they used AI or not