Theory for what, why they’re shitty people? Do I need to explain to you that straight people can be shitty?
E: Jesus Christ, do you mean the testosterone thing?? Are you going to sit here and tell me you think every straight man with testosterone anxieties is secretly gay?
yeah like, what is the underlying idea? because there has to be a reason the man just told the entire world he thinks the military isn’t manly enough. from a neutral perspective it’s just an incredible own goal, so there has to be some rationale other than he wants soldiers to be bald and hairy.
Right wing straight men have a lot of anxiety over sperm count and testosterone levels dropping since the 60s, and their solution is a bandaid (more testosterone) instead of looking at the cause (likely pollution and worse physical health). These values are based in heterosexist beliefs about testosterone and masculinity.
I know what someone who wants dick but can’t admit it to themselves acts like. I used to be one.
And I’m looking at Pete Hegseth and Jesse Watters right now.
I know a straight guy who is on gender-affirming TRT, when I asked him what it was like, he talked about how he found all kinds of women more attractive, how he would see any bit of jiggle and it would turn him on.
My friend’s fascination was withwomen’s bodies, not men’s bodies, that’s what he found himself thinking about.
The way Hegseth talks about Manly Fit Men makes it clear where his interests lie.
You are quite literally projecting. Your own personal experience and struggles with internalized homophobia doesn’t excuse using homophobia as a political weapon.
I don’t think the person you’re responding to believes that the problem is politicians being gay, but that they can’t separate their feelings about their sexuality from their job as politicians. Just because this fact can be used by homophobes to demonize gay people doesn’t mean that Republicans in office don’t have a pattern of sexual self repression that colors their politics.
You’re talking about confirmation bias, not an actual rule about the composition of the Republican Party or Republican lawmakers as a whole. Every time a Republican is outed it sticks in your mind because of the hypocrisy, but you don’t notice or remember the ~95% of them that are straight and never get ‘caught’ because they aren’t attracted to men. Turning around and using the closeted minority to insinuate that, actually, any given Republican is gay and closeted is just homophobia.
Did you miss that the thread I linked is not about Lindsay Graham and is in fact about Pete Hegseth? Did you black out on the part where you talked about how Hegseth was obviously gay because of the fixation on men having high testosterone? Blaming sexist policies on people you think are closeted is homophobia, I don’t care how much you think you see yourself in him.
I don’t consider it a ‘piety’ to say that it’s promoting homophobic viewpoints to talk about how much members of the Trump admin want to suck cock every time politics comes up, and that there are much better ways to attack them that don’t rely on homophobia 🤷♂️
I don’t say anything about Vance or Mullen or McConnell or Rubio or Kennedy being closeted.
I’ve criticized all of them plenty though, because they suck. They’re not throwing off 100,000 roentgens of closet power though.
It seems like maybe you are operating with a default assumption of obligate heterosexuality, and think that it’s automatically an insult to think about other people having latent desires.
How many married men have hit you up asking for cock on the sly? Ever had to navigate dating needing to distinguish between men who are attracted to women with penises vs men who see trans women as a psychological bridge to gay?
I’ve seen this from multiple angles, I’ve been in the closet before, and I’m currently one of the people that guys like Pete Hegseth are trying to get to top them. I know people who do sex work because they have no other option and closeted men are real people that often present real life danger to the people they get fucked by.
It seems like maybe you are operating with a default assumption of obligate heterosexuality, and think that it’s automatically an insult to think about other people having latent desires.
You want to tell me it wasn’t being used in an insulting way in the thread I linked? Really? What do you think was the point of it?
I’m no stranger to sex work, I was trans in NYC in the late 00s. I still don’t think it’s acceptable to deploy vibes based accusations of being closeted as political discourse.
Theory for what, why they’re shitty people? Do I need to explain to you that straight people can be shitty?
E: Jesus Christ, do you mean the testosterone thing?? Are you going to sit here and tell me you think every straight man with testosterone anxieties is secretly gay?
yeah like, what is the underlying idea? because there has to be a reason the man just told the entire world he thinks the military isn’t manly enough. from a neutral perspective it’s just an incredible own goal, so there has to be some rationale other than he wants soldiers to be bald and hairy.
Right wing straight men have a lot of anxiety over sperm count and testosterone levels dropping since the 60s, and their solution is a bandaid (more testosterone) instead of looking at the cause (likely pollution and worse physical health). These values are based in heterosexist beliefs about testosterone and masculinity.
right, that’s the obvious reason, but announcing it directly was obviously going to be a pr disaster. so what made it worth doing?
I know what someone who wants dick but can’t admit it to themselves acts like. I used to be one.
And I’m looking at Pete Hegseth and Jesse Watters right now.
I know a straight guy who is on gender-affirming TRT, when I asked him what it was like, he talked about how he found all kinds of women more attractive, how he would see any bit of jiggle and it would turn him on.
My friend’s fascination was withwomen’s bodies, not men’s bodies, that’s what he found himself thinking about.
The way Hegseth talks about Manly Fit Men makes it clear where his interests lie.
It’s not that hard.
You are quite literally projecting. Your own personal experience and struggles with internalized homophobia doesn’t excuse using homophobia as a political weapon.
I don’t think the person you’re responding to believes that the problem is politicians being gay, but that they can’t separate their feelings about their sexuality from their job as politicians. Just because this fact can be used by homophobes to demonize gay people doesn’t mean that Republicans in office don’t have a pattern of sexual self repression that colors their politics.
You’re talking about confirmation bias, not an actual rule about the composition of the Republican Party or Republican lawmakers as a whole. Every time a Republican is outed it sticks in your mind because of the hypocrisy, but you don’t notice or remember the ~95% of them that are straight and never get ‘caught’ because they aren’t attracted to men. Turning around and using the closeted minority to insinuate that, actually, any given Republican is gay and closeted is just homophobia.
How am I using homophobia as a political weapon? What the fuck?
Did you think Lindsay Graham was straight?
Did you miss that the thread I linked is not about Lindsay Graham and is in fact about Pete Hegseth? Did you black out on the part where you talked about how Hegseth was obviously gay because of the fixation on men having high testosterone? Blaming sexist policies on people you think are closeted is homophobia, I don’t care how much you think you see yourself in him.
Sometimes pieties get in the way of seeing what’s in front of your face.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mass_Psychology_of_Fascism
In any case we seem to agree that these are bad policies and I’m assuming we are both doing what we can to stop them in the way we best see fit.
I don’t consider it a ‘piety’ to say that it’s promoting homophobic viewpoints to talk about how much members of the Trump admin want to suck cock every time politics comes up, and that there are much better ways to attack them that don’t rely on homophobia 🤷♂️
I don’t say anything about Vance or Mullen or McConnell or Rubio or Kennedy being closeted.
I’ve criticized all of them plenty though, because they suck. They’re not throwing off 100,000 roentgens of closet power though.
It seems like maybe you are operating with a default assumption of obligate heterosexuality, and think that it’s automatically an insult to think about other people having latent desires.
How many married men have hit you up asking for cock on the sly? Ever had to navigate dating needing to distinguish between men who are attracted to women with penises vs men who see trans women as a psychological bridge to gay?
I’ve seen this from multiple angles, I’ve been in the closet before, and I’m currently one of the people that guys like Pete Hegseth are trying to get to top them. I know people who do sex work because they have no other option and closeted men are real people that often present real life danger to the people they get fucked by.
You want to tell me it wasn’t being used in an insulting way in the thread I linked? Really? What do you think was the point of it?
I’m no stranger to sex work, I was trans in NYC in the late 00s. I still don’t think it’s acceptable to deploy vibes based accusations of being closeted as political discourse.