• Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “We get the revenues. Then the servicing of the costs of the bridge and paying the debt of the bridge, and then what’s left over, there’s a split of that for 15 years,” Mr. Carney told CTV last Sunday, adding later: “There’s not going to be a lot of net to split.”

    • grte@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      The official called the new side deal with the U.S. a parallel agreement to the 2012 Canada-Michigan agreement and said it stipulates that an amount equal to half the net revenues from the bridge will be paid into a U.S.-run economic development fund. The mandate of the fund would be to increase economic development and trade between Canada and the U.S., but it will be up to the U.S. how the money is spent, the official said. The official emphasized that the money paid to the United States would not come directly from the toll revenues but would come from Canadian government coffers in an amount equal to half the net revenues from tolls.

          • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That will come down to contract details and wording. I’m sure we won’t be hearing the last of the whining from south of the boarder.

            I know in the movie industry the studios started to inflate studio fees as a way to increase movie costs. This was all for the purpose of not having to pay actors for a share of the profits. This only worked so long. Eventually actors started to negotiate for a share of box office revenues and not profits.