• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should you have to buy a nice TV for this issue to not be an issue? Why should shitty TVs have built-in advertising and glacially slow “smart” functions? Either don’t include that as TV software or fix it.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism baby!

      They want to make the same profit no matter the product you’re buying. On nice TVs they make it by making more profits on the sale, on cheap TVs they make it by selling ads.

      The reason the cheap TV is cheap is also because it’s using (even) older hardware so it’s no wonder they’re slow…

    • xander255@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The price of the TV is subsidized by the ads, promoted apps, and usage tracking. But usually poor hardware to keep the cost even lower. That’s why the models with Fire TV OS and similar ones are usually the cheapest.

        • TyrionsNose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          TVs have improved in quality since smart TVs we’re introduced. However, it’s kind of like everything else. They have stopped producing the old dumb stuff.

          It’s another reason why I advocate that we should compensated anytime our personal information is used or harvested.

          • Throwaway@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Quality? Built in apps when a roku is 30 bucks? Is that whats so expensive?

        • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I couldn’t get a TV anywhere near the size of the roku for the same price. 350 bucks for something 3x as large as a 400 dollar boob tube in 2002. Also it still has no ads.