• Lowleekun [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Fuck Elon. Also this is kind of useless as you would need to ban AI to begin with. There are several downloadable models that can produce smut and I would be surprised if they could not do CP. But most of us agree that our legislators won’t really do jack shit to help anyone, let alone fight child abuse.

    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      With enough time anyone can learn how to produce smut and it’s inevitable, but it wasn’t as easy as asking grok to do it, and any barrier of entry imho is welcome. Especially since dumdums use another persons’ server in the open to do it. Trying to limit commercial LLM’s capabilities to provide Smut-as-a-Service would cause them additional costs, create grounds to sue them and further desacrilize AI hype.

      • Lowleekun [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I am not saying that the goal is a bad one. It is a no brainer. I guess I just have less trust in the effectiveness or willingness of any of the two parties to do meaningful regulation. This feels more like an effortless propaganda move (look we “save” the kids, which our enemies want to eat). Both parties play that game without ever really changing any rules of the system. Yet we too fall for the trap of cheering them on. To summarize, this smells like a nothing burger, painted to look like a win.